|
|
 | | Re: K, haven't had this much LEGO fun in a while...
|
| (...) Looking forward to it. (...) Awwwwwwww. (...) OH no, a dose of reality? Thats no fun, wink! (...) and may I suggest that one hopper gets a newer (something from post 1972) brick with better clutch power if it hasnt already, wink! (...) Awesome (...) (18 years ago, 13-Jun-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
| | | | | K, haven't had this much LEGO fun in a while...
|
| So I've been using Mark Riley's DCC for the longest time (as many of you know) (URL) I've probably mentioned this before--I'm trying to automate my layout to basically be a 'GBC'-- (URL) who were at the Christmas train show last year saw the prelim (...) (18 years ago, 13-Jun-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
| | | | | Re: New Shirts
|
| In lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, Jeff Elliott wrote: <snip> (...) Hey you! When are you going to leave all that bad weather in SoCal and come back up here to sunny s. Ont??? We miss you! Well, I miss you--Chris, not so much... Dave K (18 years ago, 13-Jun-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
| | | | | Re: winch
|
| (...) the issue here, I believe, is that I can loop the rope 'almost' into a knot--it'll still be free to move, but at 'go', with a quick yank, it'll be a knot. I'm swayed towards an 'addendum rule' regarding the rope--it can't cross itself inside (...) (18 years ago, 13-Jun-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
| | | | | Re: New Shirts
|
| (...) Me! Me! (For a total of two?) Jeff (18 years ago, 13-Jun-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
| | | | | Re: New Shirts
|
| (...) snip (...) Count me in for 2. put Dave Down for 1 Im sure Janey will want a few. Derek, and Iain, thats 7 so far, you want 1, and that new guy... plus, wayne. Go ahead, make the tape. BUT i want to see it before you stich one. Chris (18 years ago, 13-Jun-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
| | | | | Re: winch
|
| (...) see, this is why i asked. (...) snip ya, see, thats my point. using a capstan, the rope can move VERY freely. But still... I will wait for Dave, to say he dont care either way, and Calum to say its against the rules. :) (...) OMG!!! DEATH!!! I (...) (18 years ago, 13-Jun-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
| | | | | Re: winch
|
| (...) Kinda agreed... I thought it'd be a "Straight in/straight out" kinda thing. Not the "Grade-3-wind-the-ta...ctricity." But I like creative solutions. I'm curious now what Chris has up his (...) Well, that's the thing about using a capstan. As (...) (18 years ago, 12-Jun-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
| | | | | Re: New Shirts
|
| (...) I started designing a third batch shirt (we did two runs of the original "Blueprint2001" shirt, one with the screw up on the word "Area", one without) almost two or three years ago. The idea I had come up with was a grey shirt with a set of (...) (18 years ago, 12-Jun-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
| | | | | Re: winch
|
| Maybe, I think the idea was we didn't want people to wind the rope through some complex mechanism, or tie a knot in the rope. This is leaning towards doing that. I think the rope should pull freely in either direction before the start of the (...) (18 years ago, 12-Jun-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
| | | | | Re: Attach of the Clones
|
| (...) What is the name of the dollar store chain? You are near Toronto? (18 years ago, 12-Jun-06, to lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands, lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, FTX)
| | | | | winch
|
| i this allowed in the tug of war? (URL) made one and the rope will slide back and forth before I power the thing. but to me this seems to break the spirit of this rule: Fit a rope through the robot such that * At the start of the round, the rope (...) (18 years ago, 12-Jun-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
| | | | | New Shirts
|
| Calum, Whats the word on those new shirts you started to work on? Chris (18 years ago, 12-Jun-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
| | | | | Re: Dinner?? (part deux)
|
| (...) < Something in a drunken stupor, I can only assume > Grrrs at Derek. (...) Oh goodie! Been too long since my last Dave hug. Speaking of Dave and hugs... I have something for you and its even Lego related. Janey "Shhh, it's a secret, Red Brick" (18 years ago, 9-Jun-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
| | | | | Re: Dinner?? (part deux)
|
| (...) HEY!!!! That's not nice! Maybe true, but still not nice... Geesh, so much for trying to be funny... I guess being funny is the one thing that rtl non-offical dinner posts should not be. (...) Awww, well thats very nice, what a wonderful (...) (18 years ago, 9-Jun-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
| | | | | Re: Dinner?? (part deux)
|
| (...) Awww... thats so sweet! I, too, will be at the chalet this Friday, official dinner or no Dave K (18 years ago, 8-Jun-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
| | | | | Re: Dinner?? (part deux)
|
| Janey Cook wrote: < Something in a drunken stupor, I can only assume > Regardless of whether there is an [official] dinner this Friday. I will be there for you Janey. Derek (18 years ago, 8-Jun-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
| | | | | Re: Dinner?? (part deux)
|
| (...) I assume we are, otherwise I'm going to look mighty strange sitting in a cape talking Lego to the waitress... But I must admit..... I did look for the "magic-you-aren't-au...-rtl-icon" post, even went back a few weeks... AND then.... I even (...) (18 years ago, 8-Jun-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
| | | | | Re: Dinner?? (part deux)
|
| You know I think there's a web site you can check. Derek p.s. It's Dot COM. (...) (18 years ago, 8-Jun-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
| | | | | Dinner?? (part deux)
|
| I haven't seen any []!! Are we having dinner this friday? Dave K (18 years ago, 8-Jun-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
|
