|
|
 | | Re: rtl15 PreEvent Run?
|
| (...) Hey, if you ever need anyone to PLAY Munchkin Fu with, let me know! -Greg (21 years ago, 22-Jan-04, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
| | | | | Re: rtl15 PreEvent Run?
|
| (...) let me get this straight (freak boy) someone is PAYING YOUR WAY to europe, presumably paying for your meals, and accommodations...... and in return you have to..... . .. sign your name?? that's it?? your a freak. you do no deserve to be (...) (21 years ago, 22-Jan-04, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
| | | | | Re: rtl15 PreEvent Run?
|
| (...) Hmm, does this mean I should or shouldn't ask you about getting signed copy of Munchkin Fu? Derek (21 years ago, 22-Jan-04, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
| | | | | Re: rtl15 PreEvent Run?
|
| (...) I hope so. Then they might cancel the trip and I can come to rtl15! -Greg (21 years ago, 22-Jan-04, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
| | | | | Re: rtl15 PreEvent Run?
|
| (...) UMmmmm.... if your so famous, dont-cha-think that ~MAYBE~ they might be hanging on every word you say... and reading this???? Chris "It is a very clever strategy IMHO, and I applaud Chris for thinking of it." K.C. (21 years ago, 22-Jan-04, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
| | | | | Re: rtl15 PreEvent Run?
|
| (...) I would! I, sadly, won't be able to make it to rtl15, despite my complaining for a "greg-able" contest, and even having a robot (almost) ready to compete. It seems I'm so famous that someone wants to fly me to europe to sign autographs. People (...) (21 years ago, 21-Jan-04, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
| | | | | Re: one wire, two wire, three wire, GO
|
| (...) You can easily home to the stop button, then move off, a bit. And, you could mount two buttons in the same place, one connected to your bot, one connected to the external wire. (21 years ago, 21-Jan-04, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
| | | | | Re: one wire, two wire, three wire, GO
|
| (...) Don't forget us. DanB/JennB/DaveE - the robot is done, and it will be there - even if it does play a rand7 game :) (21 years ago, 21-Jan-04, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
| | | | | Re: one wire, two wire, three wire, GO
|
| (...) Okay, let me draw the picture. (...) Hrm. I had planned on homing into the stop button. I guess I'll have to think of something else. (...) Well, so far I see this: The Dones: Steve is bringing four. Mike Purvis will have one. That means at (...) (21 years ago, 21-Jan-04, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
| | | | | Re: one wire, two wire, three wire, GO
|
| (...) Two lines running between the robots. (...) You can hold it down up to one second. You must then release it. Otherwise if you are holding it down and the other bot signals the end of its turn you've just told the other bot to play again. Give (...) (21 years ago, 21-Jan-04, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
| | | | | Re: one wire, two wire, three wire, GO
|
| (...) Sure. I will draw one up tonight. There is only one sensor per robot. When playing via arbitrator, that sensor is pushed by Robot A and is connected to Arbitrator. Arbitrator then signals Robot B to start on B's sensor port. Robot B is (...) (21 years ago, 21-Jan-04, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
| | | | | Re: one wire, two wire, three wire, GO
|
| (...) <MAJOR SNIPAGE> argh!!!! ok, today my brain is like a small bowl of mush. can someone do up a pretty picture with labels??? just to see if I got this: a sensor is connected to the arbitrator. but that sensor is actually located on Steve's (...) (21 years ago, 21-Jan-04, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
| | | | | Re: one wire, two wire, three wire, GO
|
| Oh, and that should be One Wire, Two Wire, Red Wire, Blue Wire. Derek (21 years ago, 21-Jan-04, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
| | | | | Re: one wire, two wire, three wire, GO
|
| (...) Unfortunately, as I pointed out in earlier posts this is not acceptable. Others have pointed out problems with connecting sensor ports together. I don't want any sensor port connected directly to my control lab. So, just like listening to your (...) (21 years ago, 21-Jan-04, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
| | | | | Re: one wire, two wire, three wire, GO
|
| (...) Do *I* need to explain the rules to YOU? There are two wires going between robots. YOU have a touch sensor on YOUR robot that is connected ONLY to MY sensor port. I have a touch sensor on my robot that is not connected to anything on MY robot, (...) (21 years ago, 21-Jan-04, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
| | | | | one wire, two wire, three wire, GO
|
| C$ questions the rules say this: The touch sensor must be a physical Lego Mindstorms touch sensor. When a robot has completed a move it will press its own touch sensor which will be monitored by both the opponent robot and the Arbitrator. The button (...) (21 years ago, 21-Jan-04, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
| | | | | Re: Long Wires.
|
| (...) Extra wire? Oh. I have 2 wires (one in, one out) attached. That's enought (for me) right? I think even with these long wires, things may still be tight, so I AM planning an bringing extra. As for pratice, we (here in Lafayette) are getting (...) (21 years ago, 21-Jan-04, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
| | | | | Re: Long Wires.
|
| (...) That's definitely good. The problem is we need one extra wire per robot when using the Arbitrator. So we need extra wires for this. So if you have, and can bring extra long wires, like the 3ft ones, that would be great. Derek (21 years ago, 21-Jan-04, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
| | | | | rtl15 PreEvent Run?
|
| Hey guys, I'm concerned about testing out how the event will work and interop between robots. I'm not concerned about Derek's arbitrator, but I am concerned robots won't interoperate between each other for some other unforseen reason. We've never (...) (21 years ago, 21-Jan-04, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
| | | | | Re: Long Wires.
|
| (...) I have the real long wires (I think about 3ft) attached to my robots. Is that long enough? That gives about 2.5 ft from my bot to the arbitrator. (21 years ago, 21-Jan-04, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
|
