 | | Re: On the recursive subdivision of two-dimensional food items
|
|
(...) The easiest way to divide up a bottle of liquid would be to use the spirit measure, though this is not recursive: Repeat Attach measure to bottle Repeat pour drink drink Until bottle empty Seek another bottle Until too drunk to lift glass not (...) (20 years ago, 18-Aug-04, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: On the recursive subdivision of two-dimensional food items
|
|
(...) Hey thanks Todd, I think. To be honest I just found the whole thing so funny because I can honestly say, none of my non-Afol friends can manage to spell "recursively" after a night of drinking never mind have a working theory around it based (...) (20 years ago, 18-Aug-04, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: On the recursive subdivision of two-dimensional food items
|
|
(...) Heh heh, ok, lemme see if I can give it a non-geeky explanation... Instead of eating your french toast by carving out roughly equal-sized small pieces one at a time, do this: Cut the toast in half and consider each half a new piece of toast. (...) (20 years ago, 18-Aug-04, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: On the recursive subdivision of two-dimensional food items
|
|
(...) snipped You know, I think I may take this as proof that I am missing the GEEK gene, as I heard the discussion first hand, and now I'm reading it again..... and STILL the *ONLY* part I understand is "copious amount of liquor." On a side note, (...) (20 years ago, 18-Aug-04, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: On the recursive subdivision of two-dimensional food items
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.geek, Todd Lehman wrote: snip (...) And what makes this even more impressive is that earlier in the evening, Todd gave every impression of a man so tired he couldn't hit the ground two tries out of three (although I know a (URL) (...) (20 years ago, 16-Aug-04, to lugnet.off-topic.geek, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: On the recursive subdivision of two-dimensional food items
|
|
(...) I feel privaleged to be present when this important algorithm was created. But, I am not so sure that Todd's very important contribution into the consumption of food and to the further appreciation of the culinary delights is really as limited (...) (20 years ago, 16-Aug-04, to lugnet.off-topic.geek, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: On the recursive subdivision of two-dimensional food items
|
|
(...) Well let's just say it was a thinking and reflecting kind of evening. --Todd (20 years ago, 16-Aug-04, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: On the recursive subdivision of two-dimensional food items
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.geek, Todd Lehman wrote: <snip> (...) <more snip> (...) It may be sound in theory, but I think you need to recheck your math a bit... (20 years ago, 16-Aug-04, to lugnet.off-topic.geek, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: On the recursive subdivision of two-dimensional food items
|
|
On 02:13 16-08-04, Todd Lehman wrote (...) <MUCH GEEKAGE SNIPPED> (...) Me thinks someone was over thinking this a bit too much.... excellent geek analysis... Note that this algorithm doesn't apply well to liquids in bottles or (20 years ago, 16-Aug-04, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: On the recursive subdivision of two-dimensional food items
|
|
(...) Get some sleep! :-) -->Bruce<-- (now I'm going to have make French Toast in the morning...) (20 years ago, 16-Aug-04, to lugnet.off-topic.geek, FTX)
|
| |
| | On the recursive subdivision of two-dimensional food items
|
|
Last night at IHOP, after copious amounts of beer at Rocklands, a few of us were talking about how we cut our food up into differently-sized portions during the eating process, and I realized that an algorithm exists for maximizing the total (...) (20 years ago, 16-Aug-04, to lugnet.off-topic.geek, lugnet.events.brickfest, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Brad Ventura goes to Brickfest
|
|
(...) Oops, my bad. I sent it to the email address listed by the "From" in your post. I guess that means that your t[IAddedThisAgainToA...tule.qc.ca address isn't working though. (20 years ago, 6-Aug-04, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Try to think of the glass as half full. (was: Re: Indiana Jones extends his vacation)
|
|
(...) Bruce & Lindsay, Thanks much for this great laugh on a dreary afternoon. :-D -Andrew (20 years ago, 24-Jul-04, to lugnet.off-topic.geek, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Pac-Man Wedding Cake Topper
|
|
(...) Oooo! Check out the "marriage" versions of the figures-- looks like they once came in 'tux' and 'gown' form: (URL) luck finding them, but hey, that'd be pretty cool! DaveE (20 years ago, 23-Jul-04, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Pac-Man Wedding Cake Topper
|
|
(...) I received a "not amused" glare when I suggested that very idea, but I appreciate the support! (...) than trying a futile search for a non-existent topper. Thanks! Dave! (20 years ago, 23-Jul-04, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Pac-Man Wedding Cake Topper
|
|
(...) Wouldn't the easiest thing be to just take out a slice of cake? :) Failing that, it looks like there's a couple figures on Ebay: (URL) (20 years ago, 23-Jul-04, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Pac-Man Wedding Cake Topper
|
|
I have a friend who'd like to have a Pac-Man cake topper on her wedding cake, ideally in the form of a sculpture of Mr. and Ms. Pac-Man, perhaps with a love-you heart of some kind. Any suggestions? These aren't LEGO-savvy people, so a LEGO-based (...) (20 years ago, 23-Jul-04, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Bad news for NASA
|
|
(...) Embarassing? No. Regrettable, perhaps. But please do bear with us. This one thread is messier than one might like, yes, but hopefully overall future admin activity will be the better for it. As for ObNASA's I did consider including some but (...) (20 years ago, 23-Jul-04, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.admin.nntp, lugnet.off-topic.geek, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Bad news for NASA
|
|
Don't you think it is a little embarassing that the thread is now 75% administration Lar? I pushed "nested inline" in the expectation of lots of juicy NASA stuff. You didn't even include an "ob NASA" anywhere. :( You must go back N levels to (...) (20 years ago, 23-Jul-04, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.admin.nntp, lugnet.off-topic.geek, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Legged Robots
|
|
(...) Leonard, I found the article on robotic leg motion very interesting. I hope to find time to play with springy legs in the near future. Kevin (URL) (...) (20 years ago, 22-Jul-04, to lugnet.off-topic.geek, lugnet.robotics, lugnet.technic, FTX)
|
