Subject:
|
Re: Relativity Question
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.geek
|
Date:
|
Wed, 8 Nov 2000 15:03:53 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
439 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.geek, Matthew Miller writes:
> Dan Boger <dan@peeron.com> wrote:
> > but isn't that the whole point of relativity? who's moving and who's
> > standing still?
>
> Everyone is moving.
8^)
Certainly, but one of the two parties is moving relative to the inertial
reference frame and one is not. Am I correct in thinking that the occupant
of the ship will experience Doppler Shift of light while the "stationary"
observer will not? Might that be the determining factor?
In any case, experimental evidence has borne out the prediction that time
will dilate for a body accelerating toward the speed of light--not the
stationary observer on the ground.
Dave!
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: Relativity Question
|
| (...) Does this mean once a person is travelling at a particular velocity (e.g. .99c), he will not feel any further time dilation effects if he is no longer accelerating? IOW, is time dilation only experienced during acceleration? Jude (24 years ago, 8-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
| | | Re: Relativity Question
|
| (...) Maybe. I don't understand it well enough. Lemme think about the headlights thing.... For someone standing on earth, light is moving away at about 300,000km/sec. Then, say we have a spaceship, moving at half the speed of light relative to (...) (24 years ago, 8-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
Message is in Reply To:
34 Messages in This Thread:
 
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
