Subject:
|
Re: Geektalk.
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.fun
|
Date:
|
Sat, 27 Feb 1999 20:22:09 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
cjc@newsguy%avoidspam%.com
|
Viewed:
|
389 times
|
| |
|
|
Jasper Janssen <jasper@janssen.dynip.com> wrote:
> > I ran mostly fine at 450 at 2.0 for several months, although I did
> > have ocassional lockups. I tried it at 464 at 2.1 and it worked fine
> > with ocassional lockups so I put it back to 450 at 2.1 and haven't had
> > a lockup since.
>
> Tried 2.05?
Hrmmm, actually no. I will as soon as this massive ftp is done,
though, and report back. :)
> > That's on my box. The NT server machine I just built is running at
> > 450 at 2.0 just fine, has been for a week now with no lockups.
>
> Hmm.. At 2.0, I locked immediately, 2.05, got me a lock within an
> hour, and now at 2.1 *appears* to be running alright..
Cool. Anything 2.2 and below should be fine. Most people I know
doing this (about 12 or so with probably twice as many machines) fall
into the 2.05-2.1 catagory.
> I already have a G200, and no real need for video-in. Sorry. And to
> tell you the truth - I intend to let _that_ money go back into the
> Lego Budget ;) *is currently reading sharkyextreme's review of TNT
> SLI* Looks nice.
Darn! I could really use another Metroliner, but I know my pockets
aren't deept enough to do the deal without help from computer
hardware. :)
> > We're going to put together a dual Celeron 400 rig at work in a couple
> > weeks. Run Linux and dedicated Quake2 and Half-Life servers on it.
>
> Hmm.. but the 400 is almost un-overclockable! And, despite evidence to
> the contrary, i have to suggest that Q2 & halflife aren't
> mission-critical enough to require unoverclocked ones - besides, if
> you're gonna modify celerons to work SMP, you might as well go to
> overclock too ;)
Well, we're not too concerned about overclockability. We're going
with Socket 370 cpus because we can get generic slotkit adapters that
only require a single adjustment to do dual for like $10 each. No
modification to the celeron required whatsoever. Most we can screw up
(and we won't, my buddy is doing these and he's a whiz with tiny
things like that) is the slotkit. We might have to go with the 333
versions, though. We already have a dual slot 1 board, just have to
see if it can be flashed to support multipliers high enough to go 400.
It's an LX board, not BX, so no 100 bus.
--
Unofficial listing of weekly US Lego Shop at Home phone specials
http://www.lugnet.com/lsahs/
800-835-4386 (S@H USA) / 800-267-5346 (S@H Canada)
www.lugnet.com/news/ - Focused discussion groups for LEGO fans worldwide
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: Geektalk.
|
| (...) heh. At the moment, i don't seem to be able to start zMUD anymore. I'll have to see what happens if I set the thing back to 300, but I 'spect it's something else. (...) Do you happen to know a particularly demanding testsuite, that's easy to (...) (26 years ago, 27-Feb-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
| | | Re: Geektalk.
|
| (...) I'm getting crashes. Winamp & Agent just locked, and zMUD did yesterday. Winamp & zMUD aren't particularly noteworthy for their stability, but Agent is. I've never had Agent crash before, and it crashed with a memory type of error. I think, (...) (26 years ago, 1-Mar-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Geektalk.
|
| (...) Tried 2.05? (...) Hmm.. At 2.0, I locked immediately, 2.05, got me a lock within an hour, and now at 2.1 *appears* to be running alright.. (...) I already have a G200, and no real need for video-in. Sorry. And to tell you the truth - I intend (...) (26 years ago, 27-Feb-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
14 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
