Subject:
|
Re: Geektalk.
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.fun
|
Date:
|
Sat, 27 Feb 1999 20:11:10 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
340 times
|
| |
|
|
On Sat, 27 Feb 1999 18:32:11 GMT, cjc@NOSPAMnewsguy.com (Mike Stanley)
wrote:
> I ran mostly fine at 450 at 2.0 for several months, although I did
> have ocassional lockups. I tried it at 464 at 2.1 and it worked fine
> with ocassional lockups so I put it back to 450 at 2.1 and haven't had
> a lockup since.
Tried 2.05?
>
> That's on my box. The NT server machine I just built is running at
> 450 at 2.0 just fine, has been for a week now with no lockups.
Hmm.. At 2.0, I locked immediately, 2.05, got me a lock within an
hour, and now at 2.1 *appears* to be running alright..
> All of mine are retail versions so the third one should do it at 2.0
> or 2.1 at most.
>
> Did you say you liked Matrox? I'll trade you a Marvel G200 for that
> Metroliner. :) If you don't want that I could probably swing a
> Voodoo II. I wouldn't bother with Voodoo 3 if I were you. V2 SLI
> will do just as well, and the upcoming TNT SLI will do better.
I already have a G200, and no real need for video-in. Sorry. And to
tell you the truth - I intend to let _that_ money go back into the
Lego Budget ;) *is currently reading sharkyextreme's review of TNT
SLI* Looks nice.
Now for the celeron 400 review.....
> Slot 1 yes. Lower core voltage, though. 1.85 I think. BX6-2
> supports it out of the box. Might have to update the bios on the BH6
> to do it.
Hmm. Whatever, by the time I'm able to afford a P-III, I'll want a new
motherboard anyway, most likely :)
> We're going to put together a dual Celeron 400 rig at work in a couple
> weeks. Run Linux and dedicated Quake2 and Half-Life servers on it.
Hmm.. but the 400 is almost un-overclockable! And, despite evidence to
the contrary, i have to suggest that Q2 & halflife aren't
mission-critical enough to require unoverclocked ones - besides, if
you're gonna modify celerons to work SMP, you might as well go to
overclock too ;)
I wonder what processor drives this Tamagotchi...
Jasper
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Geektalk.
|
| (...) Hrmmm, actually no. I will as soon as this massive ftp is done, though, and report back. :) (...) Cool. Anything 2.2 and below should be fine. Most people I know doing this (about 12 or so with probably twice as many machines) fall into the (...) (26 years ago, 27-Feb-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Geektalk.
|
| (...) I ran mostly fine at 450 at 2.0 for several months, although I did have ocassional lockups. I tried it at 464 at 2.1 and it worked fine with ocassional lockups so I put it back to 450 at 2.1 and haven't had a lockup since. That's on my box. (...) (26 years ago, 27-Feb-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
14 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
