Subject:
|
Re: Geektalk.
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.fun
|
Date:
|
Mon, 1 Mar 1999 22:24:45 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
602 times
|
| |
|
|
On Sat, 27 Feb 1999 20:22:09 GMT, cjc@NOSPAMnewsguy.com (Mike Stanley)
wrote:
> Jasper Janssen <jasper@janssen.dynip.com> wrote:
> > Hmm.. At 2.0, I locked immediately, 2.05, got me a lock within an
> > hour, and now at 2.1 *appears* to be running alright..
>
> Cool. Anything 2.2 and below should be fine. Most people I know
> doing this (about 12 or so with probably twice as many machines) fall
> into the 2.05-2.1 catagory.
I'm getting crashes. Winamp & Agent just locked, and zMUD did
yesterday. Winamp & zMUD aren't particularly noteworthy for their
stability, but Agent is. I've never had Agent crash before, and it
crashed with a memory type of error. I think, actually, that my
(PC-66) old memory isn't liking being driven at 100 MHz. I'll try
increasing to 2.2 Vcore, though, just to be sure it isn't the CPU.
Jasper
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Geektalk.
|
| (...) Hrmmm, I'd be willing to be money on the memory being the problem. I've never had a problem with memory but I've always made sure to buy name-brand (Micron, Samsung, NEC) PC100 CAS-2 memory. Costs a little more, but they've all been rock (...) (25 years ago, 2-Mar-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Geektalk.
|
| (...) Hrmmm, actually no. I will as soon as this massive ftp is done, though, and report back. :) (...) Cool. Anything 2.2 and below should be fine. Most people I know doing this (about 12 or so with probably twice as many machines) fall into the (...) (25 years ago, 27-Feb-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
14 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
