 | | Re: Fellowship on Film
|
|
(...) My son is ten. The only problem he had was what the other poster mentioned: even though he went to the restroom just before the start of the movie, he had to go midway through (I sent him at the safest point when little would happen onscreen) (...) (23 years ago, 21-Dec-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: LoTR # 1 on IMDB
|
|
(...) It was a good movie. A solid, though flawed, interpretation of a book that is among the greatest masterpieces of literature ever produced. As a movie, the Fellowship of the Ring lacked the subtleties of emotion and sensitivity that sets a (...) (23 years ago, 21-Dec-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: If you google the phrase "Spooky Bible Stories"...
|
|
AAAAAGGGGGHHHHH!!!!!! Hop-Frog, don't lead us to stuff like this, please! Have mercy!!! Seriously though, is this guy for real? -Dave (23 years ago, 21-Dec-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: Lord of the Rings movie
|
|
Note: the second time through I listened to the music more. It's good too. Darn it, it has been in my head all day. You can hear the entire album in QuickTime: (URL) movies cost 30% less in the Midwest... (23 years ago, 21-Dec-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: Fellowship on Film
|
|
Here's something I don't understand. WHY would anyone take children under the age of 10 to see this film. First off, it's rated PG-13. Secondly, it's 3 hours long. Finally, the story isn't suitable for younger viewers anymore than the Matrix was. (...) (23 years ago, 21-Dec-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | If you google the phrase "Spooky Bible Stories"...
|
|
...you'll end up at this lovely piece of roadkill on the Information Superhighway: (URL) could comment, but why spoil your "fun." -- Hop-Frog (this is what I get for reading threads about gay minifigs...) (23 years ago, 21-Dec-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: Fellowship
|
|
(...) Doooode! Isn't there a live action Narnia thing from the BBC? I think I saw it about three or four years ago... -- Hop-Frog (23 years ago, 21-Dec-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: Fellowship on Film
|
|
(...) Yes, kids younger than 10 should start reading the book. By the time they finish they will have no problem with the film. (It is PG-13.) Spoiler zone Spoiler zone Spoiler zone Spoiler zone Spoiler zone Spoiler zone Spoiler zone Spoiler zone (...) (23 years ago, 21-Dec-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: Sometimes being vocal about the hobby pays off
|
|
(...) D'oh! Remember that Seinfeld episode where George remembers, only too late, the great comeback/zinger line he *should* have used? Here's the way I should have responded the first time... LEGO fan? Well, of course I'm a LEGO fan. I've been a (...) (23 years ago, 21-Dec-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: Sometimes being vocal about the hobby pays off
|
|
(...) No need to duck and run..... though grinning is expected. :) Notice that I said "big LEGO fan". Does that make me a BLF? Is there a "LEGO Acronyms for Dummies" book that I could buy? I'm really struggling with some of these. But 'big' is about (...) (23 years ago, 21-Dec-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: Sometimes being vocal about the hobby pays off
|
|
"Allan Bedford" <apotomeREMOVE-THIS@...vista.net> wrote in message news:GooEsn.DKv@lugnet.com... (...) need (...) Wait Allan, you, a LEGO *fan* ??? ;-) <grin, duck, run> (...) thoughts (...) Yup!! I love some of the parts in the Creator tub though, (...) (23 years ago, 21-Dec-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: Sometimes being vocal about the hobby pays off
|
|
(...) Tim, can you please let your boss know that I'm a big LEGO fan too. If need be, I can provide her with a mailing address. ;) (...) Well, perhaps not the greatest sets, but at least one of the nicest thoughts I can think of! (...) Last year. My (...) (23 years ago, 21-Dec-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Sometimes being vocal about the hobby pays off
|
|
Hey everyone - I just stopped by my boss's house to pick up a check, and she handed me a couple presents. The boxes were quite big. A quick look identified them as either a 3033 or a Creator tub, and a basic tub (studs on the top). Turns out I got a (...) (23 years ago, 21-Dec-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: Fellowship on Film
|
|
I would agree to not take any small children to see Lord of the Rings, but for a different reason: no kid under 10 years old would be able to sit through the whole movie without needing to go to the bathroom, even if they had gone right before it (...) (23 years ago, 21-Dec-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: Lord of the Rings movie
|
|
(...) Ageist! ok, maybe it was the 3rd grader bragging a little. -Erik (23 years ago, 21-Dec-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: Fellowship
|
|
(...) Yes, well it does. But there is some dispute among Tolkien scholars about just how long Gandalfs toes were. Some claim that his toes reached about to his belt, based on scientific evidence relating toe length to thickness of eyebrows, while (...) (23 years ago, 21-Dec-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Fellowship on Film
|
|
First of all, do NOT take any small children to see this film. I would say probably 10 would be the youngest who should see it, and that is pushing it. Younger kids will have nightmares for weeks, possibly years, if they are subjected to this film. (...) (23 years ago, 21-Dec-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: Fellowship
|
|
(...) I thought it touched his toes? ROSCO (23 years ago, 21-Dec-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: Ape Linkin'
|
|
(...) What does all of this have to do with our 16th president? FUT .pun :-D -John (...) (23 years ago, 20-Dec-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: Fellowship
|
|
(...) Speaking of which, one little thing that bugged me all through the movie: The Dark Lord's stronghold is apparantly not Mordor, but is in fact Morrrdor. Roll the first "r", but definately not the second. Ah well, it's better than finding out (...) (23 years ago, 20-Dec-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
