Subject:
|
Re: Outlook express (was Re: Is LUGNET working?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.fun
|
Date:
|
Thu, 3 Jun 1999 23:10:11 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
456 times
|
| |
![Post a public reply to this message](/news/icon-reply.gif) | |
On Thu, 3 Jun 1999 21:16:52 GMT, richard.dee@virgin.net (Richard Dee) wrote:
> On Thu, 3 Jun 1999 06:51:48 GMT, Terry K uttered the following profundities...
> > I read this, and paused at the "(AFAIAA)" to figure it out. My final guess is
> > that it means As Far As I Am Aware. But my *first* guess, and the one I like
> > best, is; As Far As I Arrogantly Assume.
> >
> > :-)
> >
> >
> Thanks! :o)
> Your final guess is correct. Did I come across as arrogant
> in the gun control thread?
Really? Cool. :-)
I skim through the gun control thread, and it seems that all of it is fairly
arrogant. Which makes it interesting. <g>
-- Terry K --
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
17 Messages in This Thread: ![Is LUGNET working? -Thomas Main (1-Jun-99 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: Is LUGNET working? -Larry Pieniazek (1-Jun-99 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Is LUGNET working? -Tom McDonald (1-Jun-99 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Is LUGNET working? -Mike Poindexter (1-Jun-99 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Outlook express (was Re: Is LUGNET working? -Eric Brok (2-Jun-99 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Outlook express (was Re: Is LUGNET working? -Robert Brunskill (2-Jun-99 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Outlook express (was Re: Is LUGNET working? -Richard Dee (2-Jun-99 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: Outlook express (was Re: Is LUGNET working? -Alex Wetmore (2-Jun-99 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Outlook express (was Re: Is LUGNET working? -Richard Dee (3-Jun-99 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: Outlook express (was Re: Is LUGNET working? -Terry Keller (3-Jun-99 to lugnet.off-topic.fun)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Outlook express (was Re: Is LUGNET working? -Richard Dee (3-Jun-99 to lugnet.off-topic.fun)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![You are here](/news/here.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Outlook Express problems -Todd Lehman (2-Jun-99 to lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.general)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/268.gif) ![Re: Is LUGNET working? -Tom McDonald (1-Jun-99 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/268.gif) ![Re: Is LUGNET working? -Anders Isaksson (1-Jun-99 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Is LUGNET working? -Frank Filz (1-Jun-99 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: Is LUGNET working? -Julie Krenz (2-Jun-99 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|