Results 361 – 380 of about 1900.
|
Search took 0.01 CPU seconds.
|
|
 | | Re: codifying marriage on biblical principles
|
| (...) Well, I suppose since I'm not interested in marrying a man, I'll let this one pass for arguments sake to get onto the juicer bits below... (...) Wooohooo! But then, this isn't any different from a standard politician's template - they just (...) (21 years ago, 9-Mar-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| |
|  
bruce
(score: 0.493)
|
|
| | Re: I'm Glad Bush is Standing by Rumsfeld
|
| (...) It's the 'Murica that just grates like nails on a blackboard. But who am I to speak? I say "T'ranna" for Toronto. (...) Hey! I'm the hick here! The loud mouthed "Canada da bomb, USA SuxOrs!!" Well, no, not really. But the hick part is mostly (...) (20 years ago, 13-May-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
bruce
(score: 0.492)
|
|
| | Re: I am not a nazi.
|
| (...) I firmly believe that true Nazis (in the sense of the word where it is associated with a dark political agenda) would not quite be the kind of people who build Lego spaceships. Not even the most distorted of Nazi minds out there could possibly (...) (19 years ago, 20-Aug-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
half
(score: 0.492)
|
|
| | Re: I am not a nazi.
|
| (...) Hello Richie, i read the whole off your post (and previous about the half of the original thread). I agree to what Jamie wrote, you just choose a subject which is to overladed with emotions. In fact here in germany your MOC is illegal. When (...) (19 years ago, 18-Aug-05, to lugnet.space, lugnet.people, lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| |
|
half
(score: 0.492)
|
|
| | Re: I am not a nazi.
|
| (...) Heck, don't make that your goal; *I* build space badly, and it's nothing to aspire to. Instead, you should try to learn to build space well! One piece of semi-serious advice that I can offer for a fledgling spacer is to attempt variations on (...) (19 years ago, 18-Aug-05, to lugnet.space, lugnet.people, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
half
(score: 0.492)
|
|
| | Re: Wining Hearts & Minds
|
| In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Don Heyse wrote: <snip> (...) I don't know but the charm, for me, has faded in o-t.d. I get all excited about something and I banter with Bruce, or Dave! But it's more effort now than it was before. It's like I have to (...) (20 years ago, 5-May-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
bruce
(score: 0.491)
|
|
| | Re: George Bush has legitimised terrorism
|
| (...) It isn't the height of arrogance to claim that anymore than it is the height of arrogance to claim we don't have it right. That is -->Bruce<--'s point. That is also the problem with moral relativism, but I digress. Getting back to "we've got (...) (20 years ago, 21-Apr-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| |
|
bruce
(score: 0.489)
|
|
| | Re: George Bush has legitimised terrorism
|
| (...) I didn't think I was, but if your interpretations of my writing style is 'holier than thou', I shall endeavour to rephrase. As it stands, my interpretations of your debating technique in this thread are--you're firmly ensconsed in what you (...) (20 years ago, 21-Apr-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
bruce
(score: 0.489)
|
|
| | Re: To change the tune...
|
| (...) That still only takes up back to the he's an incompetent or liar question, and saying the answer is incompetent still means he shouldn't be president. (...) What terrorists were going to destablize his neighbors? They would have gone for Iraq (...) (21 years ago, 11-Feb-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| |
|
bruce
(score: 0.489)
|
|
| | Re: To change the tune...
|
| (...) You'll have to quote me some source for that sequence of events - it sounds like the Official Saddam Version. And yes, even if that's the real undisputed sequence (which I'll bluntly say that I doubt), he'd still do it in a heartbeat. (...) (...) (21 years ago, 11-Feb-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| |
|
bruce
(score: 0.489)
|
|
| | Re: George Bush has legitimised terrorism
|
| Boy I hate when that happens--get a perfectly good tirade going and something happens with IE! Grr!!! Anywho, this time without the frothing (well, probably not...) (...) I am the second guy. Because you chose to misinterpret my intentions, doesn't (...) (20 years ago, 21-Apr-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
bruce
(score: 0.489)
|
|
| | Re: To change the tune...
|
| (...) That's splitting hairs: "Grave and gathering" "Urgent". Bush is doing the Texas Two-Step. But on the other count, yes, Bush indicated that Saddam was to be removed from power - specifically because of the WoMD. Can't find any WoMD so now it's (...) (21 years ago, 10-Feb-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| |
|
bruce
(score: 0.489)
|
|
| |
|
bruce
(score: 0.489)
|
|
| | Re: Some people call Buicks "boats"...
|
| (...) He is? He is a popular actor, but I wouldn't call it reverance. Hmmmm. (...) Mostly, I'm just teasing about the Queen. :-) (...) There is more flag-waving in this country than in Britain (see the John Neal prototype), or such is my impression. (...) (21 years ago, 8-Feb-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| |
|
bruce
(score: 0.489)
|
|
| | Re: This is where I actually want a gun
|
| (...) "Do not think that I have come to abolish the Law or the Prophets; I have not come to abolish them but to fulfill them." Matthew 5:17 I remember my mother quoting that to me. And I also remember in the next breath that she said, "And then he (...) (21 years ago, 8-Feb-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
bruce
(score: 0.489)
|
|
| | Re: Some people call Buicks "boats"...
|
| (...) Tradition would say that Scott was being sarcastic, but maybe he wasn't. Either he honestly wanted my opinion, or perhaps it was rhetorical but he felt there was a point to it. I already placed my qualifier ("for the most part") but, yes, my (...) (21 years ago, 8-Feb-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| |
|
bruce
(score: 0.489)
|
|
| | Re: Some people call Buicks "boats"...
|
| (...) Hmmmm, I'm not sure where you are going with that analogy. Tom Cruise remains Tom Cruise whatever I do, the Queen is your Queen because you subject yourself to her. (...) Aha! You admit that the UK does not live up to its propaganda! You (...) (21 years ago, 8-Feb-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| |
|
bruce
(score: 0.489)
|
|
| | Re: To change the tune...
|
| (...) He shouldn't be in office in either case. And, no, we didn't elect him. If we get to stone every politician who lied, there would be no politicians - not that doesn't sound bad. :-) -->Bruce<-- (21 years ago, 6-Feb-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
bruce
(score: 0.488)
|
|
| | Re: To change the tune...
|
| (...) I think I already summed up this same position some time ago right here: either Dubya lied, or he was incompetent. Either way, he led the country into a contrived war, spending billions of dollars, the lives of our troops, ruined our country's (...) (21 years ago, 6-Feb-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
bruce
(score: 0.488)
|
|
| | Re: Sheikh Yassin
|
| (...) I wasn't actually saying that at all, although I'd happily agree that you could a sense of moral equivalence. But I wasn't commenting on your odd morality, or even the American revived doctrine of pre-emptive self-defense. I was simply (...) (21 years ago, 25-Mar-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
bruce
(score: 0.485)
|
More: Next Page >>
|
