Results 1181 – 1200 of 1868.
|
Search took 0.04 CPU seconds.
|
|
| |
|  
bruce
(score: 1.608)
|
|
 | | Re: Help me with the math
|
| (...) Bruce gave a good refutation of this, and in any case the buck doesn't stop with everyone else--it stops with Dubya. If he endorsed the intelligence report, then he, as the highest link in the chain, bears primary responsibility for the (...) (20 years ago, 13-Sep-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| |
|
bruce
(score: 1.608)
|
|
| |
|
bruce
(score: 1.608)
|
|
| | Re: Excellent news!
|
| (...) Since I dragged Bruce back into this, I'll field the question for him (though he's welcome to refute or add to it, of course!) (...) Of course not! The execution of a person who has been rendered harmless is indistinguishable from coldblooded (...) (19 years ago, 4-Jan-06, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| |
|
bruce
(score: 1.608)
|
|
| | Re: IGNORANT views fuel oppression?
|
| (...) Okay, it now seems official, to me at least, that Bruce has now found himself a cool new sig. So, along with "Dave!" and "++Lar", we now have "-->Bruce<--". Well, *I* want in on the action! So from now on, I am promoting the last three letters (...) (22 years ago, 11-Dec-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
bruce
(score: 1.608)
|
|
| |
|
bruce
(score: 1.608)
|
|
| | Re: slight
|
| (...) See? This is why I only skim your replies... Bruce is talking about a debate technique called an "emotional appeal" -- usually this takes the form of something that stirs the emotions of a reader or listener but that also tends to lack a (...) (22 years ago, 17-Jul-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
bruce
(score: 1.608)
|
|
| | Re: Concerns with Racial Attitudes and Lego
|
| In lugnet.starwars, Bruce Schlickbernd writes: Bruce, I fully agree with most of your points, except the following: (...) Seen from a scientific point of view, these statements are incorrect (I know you didn't necessarily mean them to be view that (...) (24 years ago, 14-Aug-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
bruce
(score: 1.608)
|
|
| |
|
bruce
(score: 1.608)
|
|
| | Re: National vote on handguns?
|
| (...) Well Bruce, I'll let you in on the fact that I worked for the Fulton County Sheriff's department for 4 years, and was well trained on how to use my firearm. Also I was very aware of what intruders can do when they break into a person's home, (...) (23 years ago, 23-Jul-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
bruce
(score: 1.608)
|
|
| | Re: National vote on handguns?
|
| (...) Sorry, Bruce, but if someone breaks into my dwelling, I'm not going to Debate with him as to his intent. BREAKING IN shows the intent, as far as I'm concerned. They'd better be ready to accept the consequences for their action. -- Tom Stangl (...) (23 years ago, 24-Jul-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
bruce
(score: 1.608)
|
|
| | Re: An armed society...(what if?)
|
| (...) Bruce, I agree with your take on why the laws were placed. However, I do think that a conspiracy evolved. Law enforcement's most important lobby is the continuation of the War On Drugs. Not because it's the right thing but because if we quit (...) (23 years ago, 24-Jan-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
bruce
(score: 1.608)
|
|
| | Dealing with the problem
|
| (...) Good analysis, Bruce, but it's not enough that just you ignore him, or that just I ignore him. For off-topic.debate to truly be enjoyable, it's necessary that EVERYONE ignore him, and manage to do so consistently. This is necessary because if (...) (22 years ago, 30-Nov-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
bruce
(score: 1.608)
|
|
| | Re: codifying marriage on biblical principles
|
| (...) lol, But -->Bruce<-- I would have expected a little snickersnee from you! Nonetheless, Kewl-- does it still fire, and more importantly: do your Liberal buddies know you own a gun;-) (...) lol I would have said Massachusetts, long before (...) (21 years ago, 11-Mar-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| |
|
bruce
(score: 1.608)
|
|
| | Re: Problems with Christianity and Darwinism
|
| In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Bruce Schlickbernd writes: (snip) (...) Sorry Bruce, but I must differ - you must be speaking as a layman there. While planets seem to exists in ever-increasing numbers - that we can see evidence of, there is no evidence (...) (24 years ago, 19-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
bruce
(score: 1.608)
|
|
| | Re: Science and beliefs (was Re: Alien races)
|
| Bruce Schlickbernd: (...) hand, (...) to (...) Evidence I gave did not *prove* creation, nor did I say that it did. But the evidence can *support* creationism. Here's a few premises: Facts exist Man discovers facts using the scientific method (...) (24 years ago, 6-Apr-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
bruce
(score: 1.608)
|
|
| |
|
bruce
(score: 1.608)
|
|
| | Re: Terrorists hate spelling properly
|
| (...) Well, Bruce old man, you sat me back on my heels there for a minute, but no, this is not an error, just yet more American Imperialism and intolerance! 'If you don't do it like me you must be wrong'. Top marks. Next you'll be explaining to me (...) (21 years ago, 14-Mar-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
bruce
(score: 1.608)
|
|
| | Re: Lavender Brick Society
|
| (...) I'm kinda with Bruce o nthis one--I mean there are those who eat oysters. Personally, I find for my dietary pleasures oysters ranking pretty much down there with mud--For myself, me eating oysters is repulsive. I have, on the other hand, been (...) (20 years ago, 17-Sep-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
bruce
(score: 1.608)
|
|
| |
|
bruce
(score: 1.608)
|
More: Next Page >>
|
