Subject:
|
Re: National vote on handguns?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Tue, 24 Jul 2001 06:41:07 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
862 times
|
| |
|
|
Bruce Schlickbernd wrote:
> > Awww, but it does say that you "believe" they are going to cause you harm.
> > If someone breaks into my house, I'm going to "believe" that they could be
> > there to cause harm to my family or myself. I will not first ask them their
> > intentions, when it comes to my family shooting first will be my response.
>
> *Reasonable* belief is what the text refers to. I can't make a better case
> for there needing to be a required course and test on firearm safety and law
> than the various responses I'm getting. :-)
Sorry, Bruce, but if someone breaks into my dwelling, I'm not going to Debate with
him as to his intent. BREAKING IN shows the intent, as far as I'm concerned.
They'd better be ready to accept the consequences for their action.
--
Tom Stangl
***http://www.vfaq.com/
***DSM Visual FAQ home
***http://ba.dsm.org/
***SF Bay Area DSMs
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: National vote on handguns?
|
| (...) *Reasonable* belief is what the text refers to. I can't make a better case for there needing to be a required course and test on firearm safety and law than the various responses I'm getting. :-) Bruce (23 years ago, 23-Jul-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
110 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
