To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 15605
15604  |  15606
Subject: 
Re: An armed society...(what if?)
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Thu, 24 Jan 2002 20:33:55 GMT
Viewed: 
1623 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Bruce Schlickbernd writes:

The individual cases are not conspiracies unto themselves.  The drug
enforcement laws are.  They only help the athorities finance themselves.
Authorities seize property then put it up for auction.  The money from the
auctions are pure profit.

The law was, in my opinion, ill-concieved in the first place and ripe for
abuse, but that doesn't mean it was some vast conspiracy to finance the
government (it was intended as a weapon against criminals).

Bruce,

I agree with your take on why the laws were placed.  However, I do think that a
conspiracy evolved.  Law enforcement's most important lobby is the continuation
of the War On Drugs.  Not because it's the right thing but because if we quit
the WOD, many, MANY police officers would have to turn to another line of work.
Without seizures, there simply wouldn't exist a budget to cover their
salaries.

We sane citizens think that would be a good thing.  The cops that will be let
go, for obvious and perfectly understandable reasons, do not.  To varrying
degrees, I think that law enforcement officials in both good and bad faith,
perpetuate their role in society by playing up the dangers of drug related
crime and by lobbying to continue the WOD.

Chris



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: An armed society...(what if?)
 
(...) I wouldn't call that a "conspiracy". They don't have to be clandestine to lobby for the continuation of the "war on drugs", in good or bad faith. I'd just as soon see the drugs legalized and have the drug dealers and drug-law enforcers put out (...) (23 years ago, 24-Jan-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: An armed society...(what if?)
 
(...) I'm not sure what your point is or how you can draw that conclusion (I already addressed your "liberal media" comment - did I miss the reply?). (...) Well, you lost me again. What does that have to do with gun control? And passing a (...) (23 years ago, 24-Jan-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

179 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR