|
| |
|  
all
(score: 0.230)
|
|
| |
|
all
(score: 0.230)
|
|
 | | Re: Apology.
|
| (...) Actually, I think you're both wrong. I just reveiwed the terms of use, and there is nothing in there about e-mail addresses, except the requirement to have a valid one in your posting ID. So if you still feel that Larry violated your privacy, (...) (23 years ago, 24-Nov-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.admin.terms)
| |
|
all
(score: 0.230)
|
|
| | Re: Apology.
|
| My My, someone got up on the wrong side of the bed this morning.... I normally stay out of debate, I don't need anymore crap in my life, though you brought this into the public forum where I do read, and of course, I had to go back and look at the (...) (23 years ago, 24-Nov-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.admin.terms, lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|
all
(score: 0.230)
|
|
| |
|
all
(score: 0.230)
|
|
| | Re: Apology.
|
| (...) Possibly. It's a very grey area. (OBDisclaimer: I'm only really arguing this to refine my understanding of what the ToU might mean in a fairly grey area.) (...) It is unreasonable to hold Lugnet's ToU to any authority beyond Lugnet, so the (...) (23 years ago, 25-Nov-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.admin.terms)
| |
|
all
(score: 0.230)
|
|
| | Re: Medical Marijuana
|
| Hmm. Your post is amazingly similar to junk mail I received today. Funny that. (...) I agree, I'm all for effective cannabis-based prescription drugs. But then many illegal drugs have a place in medicine. What is the big deal? (...) Paranoia. (...) (...) (23 years ago, 22-Nov-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
all
(score: 0.230)
|
|
| |
|
all
(score: 0.230)
|
|
| | Re: Apology.
|
| (...) No, judge the outcome. He said it was junk. He said he didn't subscribe to it. He said he didn't want it. I acted based on that. I acted to ensure he wouldn't get something he said he didn't want. The *outcome* is he's not getting it any more, (...) (23 years ago, 23-Nov-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
all
(score: 0.230)
|
|
| | Unsubscribe from the LP newsletter
|
| I checked. Scott is not subscribed to the LP newsletter under the current email tag on his post: eh105jb@mx1.pair.com... but he WAS subscribed under a tag that was in use some time ago. Not any more. Note that I only tried one address, I don't have (...) (23 years ago, 23-Nov-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
all
(score: 0.230)
|
|
| | how to lie with statistics
|
| In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Scott Arthur twists reality thusly: (...) I post a lot. So any metric ought to be on a per post basis. That winnows it down significantly. Else we're saying that Johnny one post gets the nobel peace prize because his one (...) (23 years ago, 23-Nov-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
all
(score: 0.230)
|
|
| | Re: Medical Marijuana
|
| (...) Yes, but aren't they in fact responsible, not for war as a concept, but for certain kinds of war, and certain ways of carrying out war? Arguably focus groups and the media had convinced successive administrations that the american populace (...) (23 years ago, 23-Nov-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
all
(score: 0.230)
|
|
| | Re: Medical Marijuana
|
| (...) Whoops! Hoist by my own petard. Drat. I was trying to say that the putative public opinion (which we have discovered is actually false, at least currently it seems to be) is DETRIMENTAL to the effective prosecution of war. War is messy and (...) (23 years ago, 23-Nov-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
all
(score: 0.230)
|
|
| | Re: Medical Marijuana
|
| (...) Yes, there is a benefit. One leadership at that scale cannot see the trees for the forest -- only the big problems could be dealt with, and not the smaller local ones. It is my assertion that I have no idea from here in CA what would suit the (...) (23 years ago, 23-Nov-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
all
(score: 0.230)
|
|
| | Re: Medical Marijuana
|
| "Ross Crawford" <rcrawford@csi.com> wrote in message news:Gn8F85.3rD@lugnet.com... (...) <snip stuff> (...) Dark (...) I think the Dark Age is caused by realising that there is a 'real world', seperate to the Lego world and that it may need (...) (23 years ago, 23-Nov-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
all
(score: 0.230)
|
|
| |
|
all
(score: 0.230)
|
|
| | Re: Conspiracy theories
|
| (...) I *might* believe the former, but not the latter as much. I am willing to believe that the U.S. govt. supported a plan that they were not fully aware of ala "The Tailor of Panama." (...) Of course, I agree totally with this part. But what (...) (23 years ago, 22-Nov-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
all
(score: 0.230)
|
|
| | Re: Medical Marijuana
|
| (...) Well, I wasn't (see my followup to His Royal Majesty the Frog Prince) but thanks for thinking of me just the same :-)... (...) I think most US pot is domestic "greenhouse" grown. Pot's too low value for the mass to smuggle. Cheech and Chong (...) (23 years ago, 22-Nov-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
all
(score: 0.230)
|
|
| |
|
all
(score: 0.230)
|
|
| | Re: trolling? (Was all that OT God stuff)
|
| (...) I suppose if one defined it that way, sure. Perhaps it's my inexperience with outside newsgroups other than Lugnet, but I've more just seen it as a general (non-person-specific) goading into debate. Certainly the connotations associated with (...) (23 years ago, 15-Nov-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
all
(score: 0.230)
|
