Subject:
|
Re: trolling? (Was all that OT God stuff)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Thu, 15 Nov 2001 17:49:54 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
617 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Richard Marchetti writes:
> In lugnet.off-topic.debate, David Eaton writes:
> > I guess that I just see it as the general suckering into response.
>
> And that would be incorrect in my understanding of the word "troll."
>
> troll (trol) verb
> 1. To post a message in a newsgroup or other online conference in the hopes
> that somebody else will consider the original message so outrageous that it
> demands a heated reply. A classic example of a troll is to post an article
> in favor of torturing cats in a pet lovers' newsgroup.
I suppose if one defined it that way, sure. Perhaps it's my inexperience with
outside newsgroups other than Lugnet, but I've more just seen it as a general
(non-person-specific) goading into debate. Certainly the connotations
associated with the term would agree with you.
DaveE
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: trolling? (Was all that OT God stuff)
|
| (...) And that would be incorrect in my understanding of the word "troll." troll (trol) verb 1. To post a message in a newsgroup or other online conference in the hopes that somebody else will consider the original message so outrageous that it (...) (23 years ago, 15-Nov-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
117 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
