To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 14666
14665  |  14667
Subject: 
Re: trolling? (Was all that OT God stuff)
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Thu, 15 Nov 2001 17:51:27 GMT
Viewed: 
605 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Dave Schuler writes:
I guess that I just see it as the general suckering into response. It's just
that flat insults tend to work better at getting responses than well-tempered
comments.  And of course, well-tempered comments are generally the quickest
way to quash flame fests...

Well, in that case, GO STICK YOUR FEET IN A BUCKET, YOU NOSTRIL FLARER!

Darn, and I just told Larry I don't usually get heated replies :)

DaveE



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: trolling? (Was all that OT God stuff)
 
(...) All right then. Stipulating that "troll" can reasonably be used as a neutral term, then I'll agree that I was trolling. Generally I don't accept that definition, however; never have I seen "troll" used with a positive connotation, and it's (...) (23 years ago, 15-Nov-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

117 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR