Subject:
|
Re: trolling? (Was all that OT God stuff)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Thu, 15 Nov 2001 17:51:27 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
702 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Dave Schuler writes:
> > I guess that I just see it as the general suckering into response. It's just
> > that flat insults tend to work better at getting responses than well-tempered
> > comments. And of course, well-tempered comments are generally the quickest
> > way to quash flame fests...
>
> Well, in that case, GO STICK YOUR FEET IN A BUCKET, YOU NOSTRIL FLARER!
Darn, and I just told Larry I don't usually get heated replies :)
DaveE
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: trolling? (Was all that OT God stuff)
|
| (...) All right then. Stipulating that "troll" can reasonably be used as a neutral term, then I'll agree that I was trolling. Generally I don't accept that definition, however; never have I seen "troll" used with a positive connotation, and it's (...) (23 years ago, 15-Nov-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
117 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
