|
 | | Re: Victories for smokefree ballot initiatives
|
| (...) Where? You have no right to breathe ANY air (clean OR dirty) when on my property, unless I grant it. And conversely I have no right to emit smoke on your property, unless you grant it. Therefore when you're on my property, you will breathe the (...) (20 years ago, 10-Nov-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|  
rights, property
(score: 3.968)
|
|
| |
|
rights, property
(score: 3.968)
|
|
| | Re: Gotta love Oracle...
|
| (...) Arguably, no. Not on a rights based calculus. But see Friedman (1) who argues that rights based calculus breaks down at the edges (asserting your right not to ingest one molecule of extra CO2 due to a car near but not on your property is a bit (...) (23 years ago, 8-Oct-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
rights, property
(score: 3.968)
|
|
| | Re: Libertarian theory and altruism
|
| I agree, let's put a pin in it for now. Let's start a new thread for that one. Until Todd fixes cnews, if we post in the thread where you discussed my life affirming post and agreed that initiating force is unacceptable, but didn't see the link to (...) (25 years ago, 8-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
rights, property
(score: 3.968)
|
|
| | LP POINT 2
|
| LP POINT 2 Larry If an individual were to find him/herself in your propertyist dreamland with no food, no water, no education, no money, no property and starving. What rights would he/she have? Which right would be strongest: 1. The right of the (...) (24 years ago, 27-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
rights, property
(score: 3.967)
|
|
| | Re: Idiots, Part Deux
|
| (...) No addendum needed, and mostly the system is already there. Judges do have a lot of flexibility. Unfortunately, over the years they have been given less flexibility. Also, countersuits already handle some of the problems. Mostly what has to (...) (22 years ago, 10-Feb-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
rights, property
(score: 3.967)
|
|
| |
|
rights, property
(score: 3.967)
|
|
| | Re: Fixing the world (was Re: Ldraw cannon
|
| <366C8C88.9640F50F@c...OSPAM.com> <slrn76qr20.1j0.cjc@...S.UTK.EDU> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit (...) Oh, but they are. There is a direct link between thinking that it's OK to ask/force someone else to (...) (26 years ago, 9-Dec-98, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
rights, property
(score: 3.967)
|
|
| |
|
rights, property
(score: 3.967)
|
|
| |
|
rights, property
(score: 3.967)
|
|
| |
|
rights, property
(score: 3.967)
|
|
| | Gun debate (was Re: New Web Page
|
| (...) Demonstrate the need to own LEGO, then. What a silly question. No one should have to demonstrate needs here. We're talking about acquisition of property. If I have the resources, and the acquisition of property per se does not infringe the (...) (25 years ago, 14-May-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
rights, property
(score: 3.966)
|
|
| |
|
rights, property
(score: 3.966)
|
|
| | Re: Idiots, Part Deux
|
| (...) The box is already open. This proposed law is just reminding us that it is open. But we don't want to close it. Lawsuits are the civilized way of settling disputes. (...) But what basis do you use to hold the cat thrower responsible for his (...) (22 years ago, 10-Feb-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
rights, property
(score: 3.966)
|
|
| |
|
rights, property
(score: 3.966)
|
|
| |
|
rights, property
(score: 3.966)
|
|
| | Re: Capitalism (was: People are idiots...)
|
| (...) Hmm, if land is not a good, then what rules should govern trading it? If you always have a right to some land as part of your right to exist, then what stops you from "selling" your land, and then demanding a land grant because you're now (...) (22 years ago, 11-Feb-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
rights, property
(score: 3.966)
|
|
| | Re: Copyright/Fair use question
|
| (...) If he wouldn't have purchased it a million years, then why would he want you to give a copy to him? If you're giving a copy to him because he wants it but wouldn't in a million years deign to purchase it, then it's theft. Same with books and (...) (23 years ago, 8-Feb-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
rights, property
(score: 3.966)
|
|
| | Re: Idiots, Part Deux
|
| (...) Apologies Frank, I was actually enjoying reading this particular thread, though it be waaay over my head. I was looking for Locke, Kant, and Hobbes to chime into the thread, but alas... You are probably right about the other--the lines have (...) (22 years ago, 13-Feb-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
rights, property
(score: 3.966)
|
|
| | Re: The big lie
|
| (...) I'm still resolving that part of the issue for myself, but it puts me in mind of the other side of the coin: Since the airlines are primarily private corporations, and the aircraft are their property, they are well within their rights (correct (...) (23 years ago, 28-Sep-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
rights, property
(score: 3.966)
|
