Results 3181 3200 of about 12000.
|
Search took 0.02 CPU seconds.
|
|
|
| all (score: 0.330) |
|
|
| all (score: 0.330) |
|
| | Re: Fair and Balanced, as always.
|
| (...) You weren't listening....I said sinking, stinking, garbage barge:-) You know, I have criticisms of Republicans, too, but you all have that angle covered, so my input is extreneous! (...) How much does it pay? :-) JOHN (20 years ago, 16-Sep-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| |
| all (score: 0.330) |
|
|
| all (score: 0.330) |
|
| | Re: family-safe ? (Re: Lavender Brick Society)
|
| (...) No, you didn't get it. What I am saying is that YOU tolerate only those that believe the way you do, and anyone who does not agree with you you automatically place into the homophobic, hateful camp, whether they actually are homophobic or they (...) (20 years ago, 17-Sep-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| |
| all (score: 0.330) |
|
| | Re: Lavender Brick Society
|
| (...) See Todd Lehman's response as to what Lugnet is. I had reserved my own opinion on the whole subject with the note that Lehman is the arbitrator of what Lugnet is, and knows his own philosophy on it better than I do. (...) And this is merely (...) (20 years ago, 18-Sep-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| |
| all (score: 0.330) |
|
|
| all (score: 0.330) |
|
|
| all (score: 0.330) |
|
|
| all (score: 0.330) |
|
| | Re: Lavender Brick Society
|
| (...) Whether or not you think sex should be private is irrelevant. Sexuality has never been private, even if the act of sex has been forced to take place behind closed doors. (...) It may be embarrassing or offensive to the viewer and not the (...) (20 years ago, 17-Sep-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| |
| all (score: 0.330) |
|
| | Re: Lavender Brick Society
|
| (...) I'm kinda with Bruce o nthis one--I mean there are those who eat oysters. Personally, I find for my dietary pleasures oysters ranking pretty much down there with mud--For myself, me eating oysters is repulsive. I have, on the other hand, been (...) (20 years ago, 17-Sep-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
| all (score: 0.330) |
|
| | Re: Microsoft and IBM in secret plot?
|
| (...) That's worth remembering. I can produce a real-looking pre-1985 dollar bill in Photoshop, but that hardly proves that the next 1984 dollar bill you receive came off of my desktop. After all, the Shroud of Turin can be reproduced with relative (...) (20 years ago, 14-Sep-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
| all (score: 0.330) |
|
| | Re: Microsoft and IBM in secret plot?
|
| (...) As much as she seems to like taking shots at anyone and everyone (she did, after all, blame both Bush and Canada for that huge blackout last year, in spite of the fact that Bush wasn't really any more culpable than Clinton, and Canada had (...) (20 years ago, 15-Sep-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
| all (score: 0.330) |
|
|
| all (score: 0.330) |
|
| | Re: Microsoft and IBM in secret plot?
|
| (...) Well sure, but that's the whole desire of the Bush camp, isn't it? Don't pay any attention to the issues relevant to Dubya's competence or fitness for leadership; simply focus on whether or not a "th" could or couldn't have been superscripted (...) (20 years ago, 15-Sep-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| |
| all (score: 0.330) |
|
|
| all (score: 0.330) |
|
|
| all (score: 0.330) |
|
|
| all (score: 0.330) |
|
| | Re: Worthlessness
|
| (...) Well, I do usually concur with your assessments... I don't go "I'm contributing to this charity *because* I'm a Christian!" or "I'm helping this little old lady across the street *because* of my Christian values!" Much like, I suppose, you (...) (20 years ago, 16-Sep-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
| all (score: 0.330) |
|
|
| all (score: 0.330) | More: Next Page >>
|