|
| |
|  
rights
(score: 1.975)
|
|
 | | Re: Peace in the Mid-East?
|
| (...) That is *not* what I asked (...) Not "the facts", just the "facts at hand"? What are her information sources? AIPAC? (...) They may not be the "evil oppressors Palestinians portray them to be", but they are still evil oppressors. Just take a (...) (22 years ago, 10-May-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
rights
(score: 1.975)
|
|
| | Re: Libertarian SPAM (Propaganda)
|
| (...) Four messages back from the one I'm typing now. You haven't seen a demonstration of how this is detrimental?!? Did you miss the reasons for the civil rights movement? Ensuing riots in reaction to racism? I pointed out earlier that you get that (...) (23 years ago, 15-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
rights
(score: 1.975)
|
|
| |
|
rights
(score: 1.975)
|
|
| |
|
rights
(score: 1.975)
|
|
| | Re: A question of remembrance...
|
| (...) Richard did not rebuff me. He only gave the fact I quoted some context. Or are you saying that this is not true: "Turkey and Israel are "free to take care of it". However, both have a history of ignoring human rights and murdering civilians in (...) (23 years ago, 29-Apr-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
rights
(score: 1.975)
|
|
| | Re: An armed society...
|
| (...) Um, I was kind of playing, but what do you mean? I think the 2nd is pretty clear on the matter. The issue of how the Supreme Court has allowed the curtailing of our constitutional rights is interesting, but I'm not sure that I'm ready to (...) (23 years ago, 23-Jan-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
rights
(score: 1.975)
|
|
| | Re: Elian Gonzales
|
| (...) Well, that's a colorful, if tangential, example, and I expect it might seed debates of its own. (...) I do not assert that communist states do not routinely deny civil rights, nor do I accept the basis of such an either/or determination. As (...) (24 years ago, 27-Apr-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
rights
(score: 1.975)
|
|
| | Re: Polyamory
|
| (...) OK Larry. I'll play your game again. Let's revist this message: (URL) this text: =+= The point I was making about rights concerned political freedoms. For example - here in the UK one could always choose to be, say, a communist. Can you say (...) (24 years ago, 19-Dec-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
rights
(score: 1.975)
|
|
| | Re: UN Gets It Right!
|
| (...) Yes. (...) Yes. (...) Yes, and ride on with our trusty sidekick Britain. (...) This is not possible and unconstitutional. (...) It is a farce, as exemplified by Sudan heading the human rights advisory council. One world order is a pipe dream (...) (20 years ago, 24-Jun-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| |
|
rights
(score: 1.975)
|
|
| |
|
rights
(score: 1.975)
|
|
| | Re: Conflict in the Middle East
|
| (...) I’ll admit to being a little irked by this. What has brought about “peace” in NI is the realisation that violence could only get the terrorists groups so far. The IRA (and its Loyalist counterparts) has just as little regard for “rights” (...) (23 years ago, 2-Apr-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
rights
(score: 1.975)
|
|
| | Re: Somethings been bothering me...
|
| (...) of the Cato Institute... (...) I'm mostly on the same page as you here. However I don't think the US constitution ever promised that non citizens have any particular rights outside of US borders did it? I think habeas corpus applies to (or at (...) (21 years ago, 23-Dec-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
rights
(score: 1.975)
|
|
| |
|
rights
(score: 1.975)
|
|
| |
|
rights
(score: 1.975)
|
|
| | Re: Terrorists hate freedom
|
| (...) Why are unlawful killings not investigated? This is from (URL) HRW>: “It’s a tragedy that U.S. soldiers have killed so many civilians in Baghdad,” said Joe Stork, acting executive director of the Middle East and North Africa division at Human (...) (21 years ago, 14-Mar-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| |
|
rights
(score: 1.975)
|
|
| | Re: Elian Gonzales
|
| (...) to (...) While true, that's not circular. For example, if you believe in strict creationism, your view on particular steps of the evolutionary process being true or not has no bearing, inasmuch as you've not accepted a fundamental premise (...) (24 years ago, 27-Apr-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
rights
(score: 1.975)
|
|
| | Re: Blue Hopper Car Mania...
|
| (...) Well, I sort of meant that if everyone affected by the deal agrees to it, then nothing else matters. I assume you agree that you can waive your rights if you so choose. (...) I know that Libertarians are into the Force 'n' Fraud phrase, and I (...) (25 years ago, 15-Oct-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
rights
(score: 1.975)
|
|
| | Re: Polyamory
|
| (...) You say "government" like it were an entity which just appeared after some sort of a coup. Here in the UK, the government exists "create an open and inclusive society, where rights are balanced with responsibilities, and where every citizen (...) (24 years ago, 15-Dec-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
rights
(score: 1.975)
|
|
| | Re: Poverty myths?
|
| (...) Taiwan, but the again more than half of China is uninhabitable. And Switzerland became rich charging toll rights to those who wanted to cross the Alps. Williams' arguments have less strenght under these facts, wouldn't you say? Pedro (22 years ago, 1-Feb-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
rights
(score: 1.975)
|
