To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 9153
9152  |  9154
Subject: 
Re: Essay on Emerson vs. Thoreau; civil disobedience
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Tue, 30 Jan 2001 05:03:42 GMT
Viewed: 
228 times
  
Larry Pieniazek wrote:

In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Frank Filz writes:
Shiri Dori wrote:

Hey guys,

I'm enclosing something I wrote for my English class, just a little food for
thought.

Ya, Shiri, what Frank said! Thanks for sharing. I don't have the personal
experience with the environs of Thoreau and Emerson that Frank does, but you
can be sure that this "work within the system" vs. "we need active
revolution/active resistance NOW" dichotomy is something almost anyone who
thinks a particular society is seriously off the beam needs to wrestle with.

My own compromise is that I work within the system but state to myself, and
to others that I feel need to know, that doing so does not imply my sanction
(the US government, for example, although better than many, does not have my
"consent").

Is that as effective as revolt? I think it is more so in most cases, and
that's Emerson's point.

While I tend to be on the side of "work within the system" over
"revolt", I am glad that some people feel so strongly about their cause
they are willing to go to jail for it. In fact, I am glad about this
even when I don't agree with their point of view (so long as the action
they take to get put in jail is mostly passive/non-violent). These folks
are the ones who really get us thinking about the particular cause.

In a day or two, I will have some specific ideas on working within the
system rather than against it since I was called for jury duty today and
seated on a jury. The trial is not finished yet so I can't comment on it
yet, but I will have some comments since the particular subject gave me
cause to examine my feelings deeply.

Frank



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Essay on Emerson vs. Thoreau; civil disobedience
 
(...) At the risk of being accused of jury tampering by making you aware of your rights and duties as a juror(1), check this out: (URL) discusses "jury nullification". This is a unique power that American jurors have... to find a defendent innocent (...) (23 years ago, 30-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Essay on Emerson vs. Thoreau; civil disobedience
 
(...) Ya, Shiri, what Frank said! Thanks for sharing. I don't have the personal experience with the environs of Thoreau and Emerson that Frank does, but you can be sure that this "work within the system" vs. "we need active revolution/active (...) (23 years ago, 29-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

36 Messages in This Thread:










Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR