 | | Re: Trying to understand —Scott Edward Sanburn
|
| | | Dave!, (...) Ballastic fingerprinting? Well, I don't know what that is, so you need to tell me that first. I think before we need *ANY* more gun laws, we need to start enforcing the *22,000+* laws that are on the books, which, BTW, won't solve any (...) (24 years ago, 15-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Trying to understand —Susan Hoover
|
| | | | | (...) (a question about gun registration and ballistic fingerprinting) (...) I think we should start licensing parents instead. It would solve a lot of problems. (Only half joking...) (24 years ago, 15-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Trying to understand —Dave Schuler
|
| | | | | | | (...) In Parenthood, Keanu Reeves (who gets my vote for the finest actor of all time on stage or screen (ugh—I can’t believe I even typed that!)) observed that you need a license to catch a fish, but anyone can have a child… Dave! (24 years ago, 15-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Re: Trying to understand —Jeremy H. Sproat
|
| | | | | | | | (...) I know *I'd* fail the test more than once... (...) Yes, but do you need a license to catch a child? In all honesty, Keanu Reeves isn't that bad of an actor, as long as he gets parts that are compatable with him. (Kinda like Meg Ryan, I guess.) (...) (24 years ago, 15-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: Trying to understand —Karim Nassar
|
| | | | | | | | | (...) Hehehe, Or "Much Ado About Nothing" :) Of course, it does seem that good ol' Billy Shakespear wrote a couple of John the Bastard's lines just for Keanu... :) "I cannot hide what I am" "I am not of many words..." :) Just kidding to any KR fans (...) (24 years ago, 15-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: Trying to understand —Dave Schuler
|
| | | | | | | | (...) It all depends if they're in season or not, and if they're on state game lands. (...) Or Little Buddha or My Own Private Idaho or even Johnny Mnemonic (though he wasn't the only thing wrong with that film...) Dave! (24 years ago, 15-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: Trying to understand —Frank Filz
|
| | | | | | | | (...) ObRef: cows were out of season and one of the hunters wasn't insured.... (24 years ago, 15-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Trying to understand —Scott Edward Sanburn
|
| | | | | | Susan, (...) LOL! Sometimes I wonder.... ___...___ Scott E. Sanburn-> ssanburn@cleanweb.net Systems Administrator-Affiliated Engineers -> (URL) Page -> (URL) Page -> (URL) (24 years ago, 15-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Trying to understand —Dave Schuler
|
| | | | | Scott: (...) I’m not sure if that’s the "actual" term or the term that I heard on the news. In either case, it refers to a method of gun registration in which every gun is fired before sale, and the slugs and/or casings are laser-scanned so that the (...) (24 years ago, 15-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Trying to understand —Duane Hess
|
| | | | | (...) I *believe* that this refers to test firing the gun and keeping the captured bullet for a ballistic cross reference against bullets found at the scene of a crime. Similar to the human fingerprinting system in place. (...) ^^^...^^^ That's (...) (24 years ago, 15-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Trying to understand —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | | | (...) That explains a lot. But I thought you lived on the other side of Denver? What if sex education included a practical exam? Now there's an idea. (24 years ago, 16-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Trying to understand —Kevin Wilson
|
| | | | | | | (...) Gosh. Imagine the logistics of who goes with whom (and to do what). The possibilities for disaster boggle the mind... Kevin (24 years ago, 16-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Re: Trying to understand —Steve Bliss
|
| | | | | | | | (...) This is seriously colliding with my memories of being the last kid chosen for the baseball team. "Aw, mom! School really sucked today! We had Practicals in Health today, and I was the last one picked. I had to team up <insert hated name here>! (...) (24 years ago, 16-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: Trying to understand —Dave Schuler
|
| | | | | | | | (...) And what about that place on the report card evaluating how well the child works "independently or in groups"? Dave! (24 years ago, 16-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: Trying to understand —Jeremy H. Sproat
|
| | | | | | | | (...) I'm just wondering how the lab fees would be explained to the judge. :-, Cheers, - jsproat (24 years ago, 16-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Trying to understand —Duane Hess
|
| | | | | | (...) I do live on the other (north) side of town. I went high school on the north side too. I was just a teenage observation that I had while in school. No concubines there that *I* could find. Believe me, I was looking. :-) (...) -Duane (24 years ago, 16-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Trying to understand —Bruce Schlickbernd
|
| | | | | (...) Oh man, where is this Concubine High?!? Why wasn't it around when I was a teenager? I hope this wasn't just some Freudian slip... ;-) Bruce (24 years ago, 15-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Trying to understand —Scott Edward Sanburn
|
| | | | | | To All, (...) It was a bad one, I am known for good slips. At least it would have been an interesting high school challenge. ;) Scott S. ___...___ Scott E. Sanburn-> ssanburn@cleanweb.net Systems Administrator-Affiliated Engineers -> (URL) Page -> (...) (24 years ago, 15-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Trying to understand —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | Generally the more laws you have, the more selectively you can enforce them, if you so choose. 22,000 gun laws are about 21,853 (Plus or minus 12) too many. How about reducing to the following: - if you allow your gun to be misused, you're liable (...) (24 years ago, 16-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Trying to understand —James Simpson
|
| | | | (...) I agree with your points. Regarding the besmerching of reputations, I find the recent lawsuit ploys by city governments to sue gun manufacturers a farce. Gunmakers have a legal, constitutional right to exist, and they have a legal, (...) (24 years ago, 16-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Trying to understand —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | (...) Well said. Would that everyone were as reasonable as you. My theory is that in many issues we see convolution being used as a tool to usurp, because proponents on one side or another fear that a straight up and down question might: - resolve (...) (24 years ago, 18-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
