Subject:
|
Re: Trying to understand
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Wed, 15 Mar 2000 15:52:29 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
220 times
|
| |
| |
> Ballastic fingerprinting?
I *believe* that this refers to test firing the gun and keeping the captured
bullet for a ballistic cross reference against bullets found at the scene of a
crime. Similar to the human fingerprinting system in place.
> Well, I don't know what that is, so you need
> to tell me that first. I think before we need *ANY* more gun laws, we
> need to start enforcing the *22,000+* laws that are on the books, which,
> BTW, won't solve any problems like the shootings in Concubine High
^^^^^^^^^
That's Columbine. There weren't any concubines in MY high school.
> School, the recent one in Flint, MI (I am very close to this one, and I
> know a lot about it, if you want to know), etc. The Clinton/Gore
> Administration is not enforcing the laws we have, and go "ambulance
> chase" every time there is a shooting, which is both pathetic and
> enraging. I think we need to ban their first amendment rights to free
> speech if they want to ban my second amendment rights to keep and bear
> arms.
>
> Scott S.
-Duane
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Trying to understand
|
| Dave!, (...) Ballastic fingerprinting? Well, I don't know what that is, so you need to tell me that first. I think before we need *ANY* more gun laws, we need to start enforcing the *22,000+* laws that are on the books, which, BTW, won't solve any (...) (25 years ago, 15-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
139 Messages in This Thread: (Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|