Subject:
|
Re: Trying to understand
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Wed, 15 Mar 2000 18:43:29 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
331 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Jeremy H. Sproat writes:
> Dave Schuler wrote:
> In Parenthood, Keanu Reeves (who gets my vote for the finest actor of all time
> on stage or screen (ugh—I can’t believe I even typed that!)) observed that you
> need a license to catch a fish, but anyone can have a child…
>
> Yes, but do you need a license to catch a child?
It all depends if they're in season or not, and if they're on state game lands.
> In all honesty, Keanu Reeves isn't that bad of an actor, as long as he gets
> parts that are compatable with him. (Kinda like Meg Ryan, I guess.) He was
> good in _Parenthood_ and _Bill & Ted_, but he wasn't especially moving in
> either _Matrix_ or _Dracula_...
Or Little Buddha or My Own Private Idaho or even Johnny Mnemonic (though he
wasn't the only thing wrong with that film...)
Dave!
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Trying to understand
|
| (...) I know *I'd* fail the test more than once... (...) Yes, but do you need a license to catch a child? In all honesty, Keanu Reeves isn't that bad of an actor, as long as he gets parts that are compatable with him. (Kinda like Meg Ryan, I guess.) (...) (25 years ago, 15-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
139 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
