 | | Re: Does God have a monopoly on gods? —Markus Wolf
|
| | | (...) have (...) meant (...) Well, if God's going to hold you accountable for what you've done with what you know. (And that's the impression I get from reading Romans 1 and 2) Then don't you think He would take the time and make the effort to let (...) (25 years ago, 4-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Does God have a monopoly on gods? —Ben Roller
|
| | | | | (...) I didn't want to be picky, so I almost didn't post this, but... It's important to realize that not every religion has a God. That is, I think, one of the more common differences between Eastern and Western religions. Ben Roller (25 years ago, 4-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Does God have a monopoly on gods? —Markus Wolf
|
| | | | | | (...) I honestly know little to nothing about eastern religions. But I figure, if there's no god to be accountible to, it doesn't matter if you believe in it or not. It might be a nice little "this is good, this is bad" system that might have it's (...) (25 years ago, 4-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Eastern vs. Western religions (was: Re: Does God have a monopoly on gods?) —Todd Lehman
|
| | | | | | | (...) Well, from what I know of Eastern religions, they've always made more sense to me than Western religions. (I'm thinking Zen Buddhism vs. Christianity in particular here.) (...) IMHO, holding oneself accountable to a deity is to ignore the one (...) (25 years ago, 4-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Re: Eastern vs. Western religions (was: Re: Does God have a monopoly on gods?) —Markus Wolf
|
| | | | | | | | | (...) that (...) And my beanie little brain fluctuates in a different manner. I think since people's understanding is so limited, especially of each other, they can't possibly know the heart of the one they're forgiving. We can rationalize that (...) (25 years ago, 5-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Re: Eastern vs. Western religions (was: Re: Does God have a monopoly on gods?) —Ben Roller
|
| | | | | | | | (...) So Todd, is that just your opinion or what? ;) Ben Roller (25 years ago, 5-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Does God have a monopoly on gods? —Richard Marchetti
|
| | | | | | | (...) I would suggest that its a conceit of your ego that these "things" exist. Love is probably just your nervous system "grooving" with someone else's nervous system. There are lots of popular "scientific" views now that "love" is largely a (...) (25 years ago, 4-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Re: Does God have a monopoly on gods? —Markus Wolf
|
| | | | | | | | (...) I knew that somehow you could boil it down to a mechanical apparatus if you wanted to. But in my heart I've gotta believe that we're more than just really sophisticated amoebas (no nitpicking please!) There are truths that supersede science (...) (25 years ago, 5-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: Does God have a monopoly on gods? —Richard Marchetti
|
| | | | | | | | (...) I think the more we build up the idea of love, the more disappointed we are in how it plays out in reality. By accepting a more science-based view, I feel I have something closer to the truth of it and I am therefore not disappointed in my (...) (25 years ago, 5-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: Does God have a monopoly on gods? —Markus Wolf
|
| | | | | | | | (...) But I think you're limiting yourself by settling for such low expectations of love. Not to sound psychological, but if you're protecting yourself from being hurt, then your protecting yourself from the joy that could possibly come too. Of (...) (25 years ago, 6-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: Does God have a monopoly on gods? —Richard Marchetti
|
| | | | | | | | (...) I think this is an interesting thing for you to say. If memory serves, you are paraphrasing Paul (1 Corinthians 13? Except in King James it says "charity" instead of "love"). The difference is that Paul was talking about God's love for (...) (25 years ago, 6-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: Does God have a monopoly on gods? —Markus Wolf
|
| | | | | | | | (...) Well, my friend,, you got the right passage but you better re-read it. My paraphrase (actually my best recollection from the New International version) is not merely God's love for humanity. But you are correct that love in it's purest form (...) (25 years ago, 7-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Does God have a monopoly on gods? —Ben Roller
|
| | | | | | (...) I think the point of those religions is that you believe in it because it's true, not because you are afraid of your god. Ben Roller (25 years ago, 5-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Does God have a monopoly on gods? —Markus Wolf
|
| | | | | | (...) it (...) Point well taken. How do you base what you believe is true? On what fits your current lifestyle best? I met a woman once who told me she believed in reincarnation just because she felt like it. She was a "Good Lutheran." (her words) (...) (25 years ago, 6-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Does God have a monopoly on gods? —James Brown
|
| | | | (...) Seems to me that God, if so inclined, could demonstrate the truth in a way that leaves no question, no doubting, and can't be denied or avoided. God is omnipotent, after all. James (URL) (25 years ago, 5-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
