Subject:
|
Re: IP (was: Re: Any suggestions on a homepage?)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Fri, 21 Jan 2000 20:31:20 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
{lpieniazek@novera}antispam{.com}
|
Viewed:
|
645 times
|
| |
|
|
Mike Stanley wrote:
>
> On Thu, 20 Jan 2000 11:57:55 GMT, Larry Pieniazek <lar@voyager.net>
> wrote:
>
> > know. I never claimed to have all the answers.
>
> (I stopped reading .debate a while ago because I don't have the time
> to read the same old arguments, much less participate in them but I
> just had to respond to this since I glanced at it before hitting
> delete.)
>
> How can you be perfect and not have all the answers? I know it's
> probably just my imperfection that keeps me from understanding this,
> and I know your ways are mysterious, but I'm trying to figure this
> out...
It's a limited perfection. I'm perfect, but not omniescent.
Either that, or I DO have all the answers but am not willing to reveal
them.
:-)
--
Larry Pieniazek - larryp@novera.com - http://my.voyager.net/lar
http://www.mercator.com. Mercator, the e-business transformation company
fund Lugnet(tm): http://www.ebates.com/ ref: lar, 1/2 $$ to lugnet.
Note: this is a family forum!
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: IP (was: Re: Any suggestions on a homepage?)
|
| (...) (I stopped reading .debate a while ago because I don't have the time to read the same old arguments, much less participate in them but I just had to respond to this since I glanced at it before hitting delete.) How can you be perfect and not (...) (25 years ago, 21-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
34 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
