Subject:
|
Re: Adventurer Maps
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Wed, 22 Dec 1999 03:28:04 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
789 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Jasper Janssen writes:
> On Tue, 21 Dec 1999 16:14:35 GMT, "Jeff Stembel" <Dragonelf1@aol.com>
> > What about the theory that the blocks are a type of cement? That they were
> > poured into place? I don't remember who put forth that theory, but it was on
> > one of the (numerous) shows about the pyramids.
>
> I don't believe it. Sandstone doesn't form naturally that easily, it
> needs a lot of pressure. Besides, that would mean that they were
> poured _nearly into place, and then they removed the pouring case from
> under it - if they had poured it, they'd have poured the one block
> right on top of the other, giving a much stronger structure.
I saw a website that had theorized they used water - essentially making an
artifical lake, and building a pyramid in it (very simplified), which seemed
more feasable than many theories I've heard.
<plays the URL hunt game>.. Here: http://www.thepump.org/
Neat stuff. Not being a mech eng, I have no idea if they're on track or on
crack, but it sounds good to the layman in me. :)
James
http://www.shades-of-night.com/lego/
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Adventurer Maps
|
| (...) I don't believe it. Sandstone doesn't form naturally that easily, it needs a lot of pressure. Besides, that would mean that they were poured _nearly into place, and then they removed the pouring case from under it - if they had poured it, (...) (25 years ago, 22-Dec-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
17 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
