Subject:
|
Re: Adventurer Maps
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Wed, 22 Dec 1999 01:22:23 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
413 times
|
| |
|
|
On Tue, 21 Dec 1999 16:14:35 GMT, "Jeff Stembel" <Dragonelf1@aol.com>
wrote:
> What about the theory that the blocks are a type of cement? That they were
> poured into place? I don't remember who put forth that theory, but it was on
> one of the (numerous) shows about the pyramids.
I don't believe it. Sandstone doesn't form naturally that easily, it
needs a lot of pressure. Besides, that would mean that they were
poured _nearly into place, and then they removed the pouring case from
under it - if they had poured it, they'd have poured the one block
right on top of the other, giving a much stronger structure.
Jasper
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Adventurer Maps
|
| (...) I saw a website that had theorized they used water - essentially making an artifical lake, and building a pyramid in it (very simplified), which seemed more feasable than many theories I've heard. <plays the URL hunt game>.. Here: (URL) stuff. (...) (25 years ago, 22-Dec-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Adventurer Maps
|
| (...) What about the theory that the blocks are a type of cement? That they were poured into place? I don't remember who put forth that theory, but it was on one of the (numerous) shows about the pyramids. Jeff P.S. Did you know that Europe/Africa (...) (25 years ago, 21-Dec-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
17 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
