Subject:
|
Re: Supply-Side Economics? The Evidence Says No!
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Tue, 17 Oct 2006 20:04:42 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2716 times
|
| |
![Post a public reply to this message](/news/icon-reply.gif) | |
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Dave Schuler wrote:
|
Besides, Johns grasp is at least 100% as good as mine.
|
Hey, I think I was just sucker-punched....
JOHN
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
![](/news/x.gif) | | Re: Supply-Side Economics? The Evidence Says No!
|
| (...) I find that offensive and insulting. I've worked long and hard to foul up my understanding of percentages, and I won't have you casting aspersions on my diligent efforts! Do you think dim-wittedeness like this comes easily? No way! Besides, (...) (18 years ago, 17-Oct-06, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
19 Messages in This Thread: ![Supply-Side Economics? The Evidence Says No! -Dave Schuler (16-Oct-06 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Supply-Side Economics? The Evidence Says No! -Timothy Gould (16-Oct-06 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Supply-Side Economics? The Evidence Says No! -Dave Schuler (16-Oct-06 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Supply-Side Economics? The Evidence Says No! -John Neal (16-Oct-06 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Supply-Side Economics? The Evidence Says No! -Dave Schuler (16-Oct-06 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Supply-Side Economics? The Evidence Says No! -John Neal (16-Oct-06 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: Supply-Side Economics? The Evidence Says No! -Timothy Gould (16-Oct-06 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/268.gif) ![Re: Supply-Side Economics? The Evidence Says No! -Dave Schuler (17-Oct-06 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Supply-Side Economics? The Evidence Says No! -John Neal (17-Oct-06 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Supply-Side Economics? The Evidence Says No! -Dave Schuler (17-Oct-06 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Supply-Side Economics? The Evidence Says No! -John Neal (17-Oct-06 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Supply-Side Economics? The Evidence Says No! -Timothy Gould (17-Oct-06 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Supply-Side Economics? The Evidence Says No! -John Neal (17-Oct-06 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Supply-Side Economics? The Evidence Says No! -Timothy Gould (17-Oct-06 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Supply-Side Economics? The Evidence Says No! -Dave Schuler (17-Oct-06 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![You are here](/news/here.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: Supply-Side Economics? The Evidence Says No! -Tim David (17-Oct-06 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Supply-Side Economics? The Evidence Says No! -Tim David (17-Oct-06 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Supply-Side Economics? The Evidence Says No! -John Neal (17-Oct-06 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|