Subject:
|
Re: Supply-Side Economics? The Evidence Says No!
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Mon, 16 Oct 2006 21:04:03 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2182 times
|
| |
![Post a public reply to this message](/news/icon-reply.gif) | |
--snip--
|
if for no other reason than the
commonwealth becomes greater, allowing even the lazy and neer-do-wells to
benefit.
JOHN
|
But thats true in any developed country at any time since WWII. The standard of
living of the developed world has increased consistently (albeit faster or
slower at times) because science and technology has allowed it to. Its a true
statement but it cant be used in an argument for or against any system of
socio-economics.
Tim
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
![](/news/x.gif) | | Re: Supply-Side Economics? The Evidence Says No!
|
| (...) How's that math working for you lately, Dave!? Looks like half of perfect from here the obstructed-view seats.... (...) Well, that certainly was easy....:-) (...) But it is the metric by which we have consistently gauged the economy. I realize (...) (18 years ago, 16-Oct-06, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
19 Messages in This Thread: ![Supply-Side Economics? The Evidence Says No! -Dave Schuler (16-Oct-06 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Supply-Side Economics? The Evidence Says No! -Timothy Gould (16-Oct-06 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Supply-Side Economics? The Evidence Says No! -Dave Schuler (16-Oct-06 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Supply-Side Economics? The Evidence Says No! -John Neal (16-Oct-06 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Supply-Side Economics? The Evidence Says No! -Dave Schuler (16-Oct-06 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Supply-Side Economics? The Evidence Says No! -John Neal (16-Oct-06 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![You are here](/news/here.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/268.gif) ![Re: Supply-Side Economics? The Evidence Says No! -Dave Schuler (17-Oct-06 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Supply-Side Economics? The Evidence Says No! -John Neal (17-Oct-06 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Supply-Side Economics? The Evidence Says No! -Dave Schuler (17-Oct-06 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Supply-Side Economics? The Evidence Says No! -John Neal (17-Oct-06 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Supply-Side Economics? The Evidence Says No! -Timothy Gould (17-Oct-06 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Supply-Side Economics? The Evidence Says No! -John Neal (17-Oct-06 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Supply-Side Economics? The Evidence Says No! -Timothy Gould (17-Oct-06 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Supply-Side Economics? The Evidence Says No! -Dave Schuler (17-Oct-06 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Supply-Side Economics? The Evidence Says No! -John Neal (17-Oct-06 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: Supply-Side Economics? The Evidence Says No! -Tim David (17-Oct-06 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Supply-Side Economics? The Evidence Says No! -Tim David (17-Oct-06 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Supply-Side Economics? The Evidence Says No! -John Neal (17-Oct-06 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|