Subject:
|
Supply-Side Economics? The Evidence Says No!
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Mon, 16 Oct 2006 16:50:56 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2091 times
|
| |
![Post a public reply to this message](/news/icon-reply.gif) | |
Read about it
here in Scientific American.
Its been clear since at least the time of Reagans disastrous administration
that this reward-the-wealthy approach wasnt the societal boon that it was
advertised to be, but now we have scientific evidence. Interesting!
Incidentally, for those reading from the sidelines, I give this post an 8 out of
ten for derisiveness but just 6 out of 10 for snarkiness. I should really work
on sharpening my rhetoric.
Dave!
|
|
Message has 1 Reply: ![](/news/x.gif) | | Re: Supply-Side Economics? The Evidence Says No!
|
| (...) While I suspect the conclusions of the study are correct it seems like a highly flawed study from that write-up. For one thing calling Australia a low tax country is a little odd considering that the top rate was about 50% until very recently. (...) (18 years ago, 16-Oct-06, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
19 Messages in This Thread: ![You are here](/news/here.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Supply-Side Economics? The Evidence Says No! -Timothy Gould (16-Oct-06 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Supply-Side Economics? The Evidence Says No! -Dave Schuler (16-Oct-06 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Supply-Side Economics? The Evidence Says No! -John Neal (16-Oct-06 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Supply-Side Economics? The Evidence Says No! -Dave Schuler (16-Oct-06 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Supply-Side Economics? The Evidence Says No! -John Neal (16-Oct-06 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: Supply-Side Economics? The Evidence Says No! -Timothy Gould (16-Oct-06 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/268.gif) ![Re: Supply-Side Economics? The Evidence Says No! -Dave Schuler (17-Oct-06 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Supply-Side Economics? The Evidence Says No! -John Neal (17-Oct-06 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Supply-Side Economics? The Evidence Says No! -Dave Schuler (17-Oct-06 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Supply-Side Economics? The Evidence Says No! -John Neal (17-Oct-06 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Supply-Side Economics? The Evidence Says No! -Timothy Gould (17-Oct-06 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Supply-Side Economics? The Evidence Says No! -John Neal (17-Oct-06 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Supply-Side Economics? The Evidence Says No! -Timothy Gould (17-Oct-06 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Supply-Side Economics? The Evidence Says No! -Dave Schuler (17-Oct-06 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Supply-Side Economics? The Evidence Says No! -John Neal (17-Oct-06 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: Supply-Side Economics? The Evidence Says No! -Tim David (17-Oct-06 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Supply-Side Economics? The Evidence Says No! -Tim David (17-Oct-06 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Supply-Side Economics? The Evidence Says No! -John Neal (17-Oct-06 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|