Subject:
|
Re: Supply-Side Economics? The Evidence Says No!
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Tue, 17 Oct 2006 15:10:24 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2249 times
|
| |
![Post a public reply to this message](/news/icon-reply.gif) | |
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Tim David wrote:
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, John Neal wrote:
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Dave Schuler wrote:
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, John Neal wrote:
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Dave Schuler wrote:
|
All things considered, Im more annoyed that you didnt riff on my rating
system than that you questioned the methodology of the study!
|
I give your weak attempt at humor a 2.5 out of 5 (whoopie-cushions).
|
Hey, Ill take that. Thats 25% of perfect, after all.
|
Hows that math working for you lately, Dave!? Looks like half of perfect
from here the obstructed-view seats....
|
Depends on what perfect is. Could be 2x perfect (if perfect=0)
Tim
|
OK, my maths is really wrong there :very embarassed: (2x0=0) Infinately better
than perfect then.
Tim
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
19 Messages in This Thread: ![Supply-Side Economics? The Evidence Says No! -Dave Schuler (16-Oct-06 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Supply-Side Economics? The Evidence Says No! -Timothy Gould (16-Oct-06 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Supply-Side Economics? The Evidence Says No! -Dave Schuler (16-Oct-06 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Supply-Side Economics? The Evidence Says No! -John Neal (16-Oct-06 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Supply-Side Economics? The Evidence Says No! -Dave Schuler (16-Oct-06 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Supply-Side Economics? The Evidence Says No! -John Neal (16-Oct-06 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: Supply-Side Economics? The Evidence Says No! -Timothy Gould (16-Oct-06 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/268.gif) ![Re: Supply-Side Economics? The Evidence Says No! -Dave Schuler (17-Oct-06 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Supply-Side Economics? The Evidence Says No! -John Neal (17-Oct-06 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Supply-Side Economics? The Evidence Says No! -Dave Schuler (17-Oct-06 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Supply-Side Economics? The Evidence Says No! -John Neal (17-Oct-06 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Supply-Side Economics? The Evidence Says No! -Timothy Gould (17-Oct-06 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Supply-Side Economics? The Evidence Says No! -John Neal (17-Oct-06 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Supply-Side Economics? The Evidence Says No! -Timothy Gould (17-Oct-06 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Supply-Side Economics? The Evidence Says No! -Dave Schuler (17-Oct-06 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Supply-Side Economics? The Evidence Says No! -John Neal (17-Oct-06 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: Supply-Side Economics? The Evidence Says No! -Tim David (17-Oct-06 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![You are here](/news/here.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Supply-Side Economics? The Evidence Says No! -John Neal (17-Oct-06 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|