To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 27947
27946  |  27948
Subject: 
Re: Supply-Side Economics? The Evidence Says No!
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Mon, 16 Oct 2006 17:13:29 GMT
Viewed: 
2104 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Dave Schuler wrote:
   Read about it here in Scientific American.

It’s been clear since at least the time of Reagan’s disastrous administration that this reward-the-wealthy approach wasn’t the societal boon that it was advertised to be, but now we have scientific evidence. Interesting!

Incidentally, for those reading from the sidelines, I give this post an 8 out of ten for derisiveness but just 6 out of 10 for snarkiness. I should really work on sharpening my rhetoric.

Dave!

While I suspect the conclusions of the study are correct it seems like a highly flawed study from that write-up. For one thing calling Australia a low tax country is a little odd considering that the top rate was about 50% until very recently. For another thing essentially they are comparing one set of related cultures (multicultural Anglo-saxon) with another (monocultural Nordic) which hardly removes other possible causes for the differences.

That said, I have seen little evidence 1 to suggest that the predominantly laissez-faire approach (such as in the US) is innately better at creating wealth than a more socially balanced system and given the choice between two equal options I would rather a system determined by merit than parental income.

Tim

1 I know someone will come back with the GDP per capita of the USA but I will tell that person to look at the GDP per manhour instead. The US is only richer becuase the people work longer.



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Supply-Side Economics? The Evidence Says No!
 
(...) All things considered, I'm more annoyed that you didn't riff on my rating system than that you questioned the methodology of the study! Dave! (18 years ago, 16-Oct-06, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

Message is in Reply To:
  Supply-Side Economics? The Evidence Says No!
 
Read about it (URL) in Scientific American. It's been clear since at least the time of Reagan's disastrous administration that this reward-the-wealthy approach wasn't the societal boon that it was advertised to be, but now we have scientific (...) (18 years ago, 16-Oct-06, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

19 Messages in This Thread:



Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR