Subject:
|
Re: Supply-Side Economics? The Evidence Says No!
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Mon, 16 Oct 2006 18:29:17 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2142 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Dave Schuler wrote:
| |
All things considered, I’m more annoyed that you didn’t riff on my rating
system than that you questioned the methodology of the study!
|
I give your weak attempt at humor a 2.5 out of 5 (whoopie-cushions).
As for the study, I was under the impression that the whole debate WRT
supply-side economics was all but over.
It worked fabulously for Reagan (spending did him in). It is working likewise
for GWB now.
To be economically where we are now after having absorbed the catastrophes of
9-11 and Katrina is nothing less than miraculous (as the Dow inches towards
12,000).
As for the study, I’ve yet to read it, but I’ll get to it (4 out of 5 chance I
will)
JOHN
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Supply-Side Economics? The Evidence Says No!
|
| (...) Hey, I'll take that. That's 25% of perfect, after all. (...) That's right--it's a disastrous policy divorced from reality and favored only by the very wealthy who understand its implications and the not-so-wealthy who don't. End of debate! (...) (18 years ago, 16-Oct-06, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
Message is in Reply To:
19 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
