Subject:
|
Re: Supply-Side Economics? The Evidence Says No!
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Mon, 16 Oct 2006 18:08:16 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2122 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Timothy Gould wrote:
| |
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Dave Schuler wrote:
| |
Read about it
here in Scientific American.
It’s been clear since at least the time of Reagan’s disastrous
administration that this reward-the-wealthy approach wasn’t the societal
boon that it was advertised to be, but now we have scientific evidence.
Interesting!
Incidentally, for those reading from the sidelines, I give this post an 8
out of ten for derisiveness but just 6 out of 10 for snarkiness. I should
really work on sharpening my rhetoric.
|
|
| |
While I suspect the conclusions of the study are correct it seems like a
highly flawed study from that write-up.
|
All things considered, I’m more annoyed that you didn’t riff on my rating system
than that you questioned the methodology of the study!
Dave!
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Supply-Side Economics? The Evidence Says No!
|
| (...) I give your weak attempt at humor a 2.5 out of 5 (whoopie-cushions). As for the study, I was under the impression that the whole debate WRT supply-side economics was all but over. It worked fabulously for Reagan (spending did him in). It is (...) (18 years ago, 16-Oct-06, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Supply-Side Economics? The Evidence Says No!
|
| (...) While I suspect the conclusions of the study are correct it seems like a highly flawed study from that write-up. For one thing calling Australia a low tax country is a little odd considering that the top rate was about 50% until very recently. (...) (18 years ago, 16-Oct-06, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
19 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
