Subject:
|
Re: Moonbase Module - Mech Bay 07
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Mon, 26 Sep 2005 23:51:14 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
4103 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Timothy Gould wrote:
> In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Tony Hafner wrote:
> > In lugnet.build.mecha, Timothy Gould wrote:
> > > If number of responses is a good measure of a posts validity then Bonktron
> > > is doing very well.
> >
> > And flying swastikas are doing well, as are just about any lame topic that is
> > widely and incorrectly cross-posted.
> >
> > A post about a dying MOC is a lot more interesting to me than the bulk of the
> > posts that I've seen in the last month in .space.
>
> It was Eric who brought up this point about number of responses, I merely
> pointed out that by his argument Bonktron was quite valid too, contrary to
> his previous posts.
>
> I take it then that you agree with me that it is not a good measure of
> validity?
Agreed, yes- sorry if I misread what you said. I don't recall seeing where Eric
brought up that point, but no matter.
Again, I don't really care what Eric has done to other folks out of the current
context. It has nothing to do with Space, and clearly has nothing to do with
the post that he made. What I saw was Eric posting about a perfectly valid
topic and then getting attacked from many sides for no discernible reason.
--
Tony Hafner
www.hafhead.com
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Moonbase Module - Mech Bay 07
|
| (...) It was Eric who brought up this point about number of responses, I merely pointed out that by his argument Bonktron was quite valid too, contrary to his previous posts. I take it then that you agree with me that it is not a good measure of (...) (19 years ago, 21-Sep-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
65 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
