To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 27111
27110  |  27112
Subject: 
Freedom of Protest, was Re: Schpiffkraft Hakenkreuz
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Tue, 9 Aug 2005 19:51:42 GMT
Viewed: 
1196 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Samuel Morrison wrote:
  
   Let me paint a clearer picture than: when I wrote “organize”, I meant “gather to demonstrate (peacefully) and express the ideals of their group, no matter what they may be. I would restrict their right to assemble on the basis that their virtues involve inappropriate behavior with children, and has been deemed harmful to children. Likewise, regardless of the finer points of Naziing or whatever it’s called, it is viewed by minority groups to be harmful. This isn’t a case of hurt feelings - Naziing is directly responsible for 6 to 11 million people being killed in Europe in the 1930’s and 1940’s.

-nk

And what is “inappropriate”? Who decides? You? Some would argue it is inappropriate that women are permitted out in public unveiled. Sure, Nazism is a horrible, evil thing, but should we restrict someone’s right to act like a jerk if they want to? You’re equating the use of a swastika to killing millions, and it’s an entirely different issue. A symbol is not murder.

Nick’s point is that there is a difference between “restrict someone’s right to act like a jerk” AND “restrict someone’s right to act like a jerk anywhere they please.

The Supreme Court has held up “free speach zones” - especially on college campuses - to limit where protests can happen, and where free speech can be exercised. The rationale is that the right to protest doesn’t interfere with someone else’s right to go into a building and work.

In the case of the NAMBLA protesting in front of a daycare - we must balance their rights with the rights of parents who need to pick their children up from daycare. Don’t they have rights?



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Schpiffkraft Hakenkreuz
 
(...) And what is "inappropriate"? Who decides? You? Some would argue it is inappropriate that women are permitted out in public unveiled. Sure, Nazism is a horrible, evil thing, but should we restrict someone's right to act like a jerk if they want (...) (19 years ago, 9-Aug-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

30 Messages in This Thread:










Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR