To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 27100
27099  |  27101
Subject: 
Re: Schpiffkraft Hakenkreuz
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Tue, 9 Aug 2005 15:56:42 GMT
Viewed: 
1133 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Nick Kappatos wrote:
   Actually, “Freedom of speech is there” because it was amended to the US Constitution in the Bill of Rights. It’s not there specifically to protect what someone may find offensive.

On the contrary--the only speech that requires protection is that which society-at-large finds suitable for censorship.

   Besides, not all speech is protected. Look up “slander” some time.

Unless you’re equating “offensive” artistic expression with slander, this point is irrelevant. Likewise, arguments about “yelling fire in a theater” are irrelevant until the display of artistic creations can be shown to have a similiarly immediate, urgent, and dangerous effect.

   Here’s the Free Speech Question of the Day: If all speech is free, can members of NAMBLA organize in front of a day care center? Should they? Even you must draw the line somewhere.

If they are a non-illegal organization and they meet on public property while creating no disturbance, on what basis would you restrict their right to assemble peaceably?

Dave!



Message has 3 Replies:
  Re: Schpiffkraft Hakenkreuz
 
(...) "requires protection" All speech is protected, but only some speech needs to be protected. -Lenny (19 years ago, 9-Aug-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
  Re: Schpiffkraft Hakenkreuz
 
(...) I don't believe that speech was included at the time of the BoR for society-at-large censorship, but rather protection from vengeful governing bodies like royalty or Congress. As I stated earlier, there were no neo-nazis in the late 18th (...) (19 years ago, 9-Aug-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
  Re: Schpiffkraft Hakenkreuz
 
(...) (19 years ago, 9-Aug-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Schpiffkraft Hakenkreuz
 
(...) Just because one should be free to speak their mind, doesn't mean that should be able to at the expense of other's pursuit of Life, Liberty, and Pursuit of Happiness, which is the basic premise of the Constitution. We "bother with it" because (...) (19 years ago, 9-Aug-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

30 Messages in This Thread:










Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR