Subject:
|
Re: Repost, for the benefit of those on newsreaders
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Tue, 31 May 2005 14:06:57 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2348 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek wrote:
| |
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, John Neal wrote:
|
| |
| |
That’s my whole point, Tom! The election wasn’t rigged, for pete’s sake!
|
How would you know? The Diebold machines can make up whatever results they’re
programmed to make up, and there is no paper trail of validated vote receipts
to audit... recounts consist of checking the same files again to see if they
have the same data.
Ohio **could** have been stolen and we’d never know.
|
That’s my point: we’ll never know--one way or the other! So the conspiracy
theorists joyfully foam at the mouth without any prove whatsoever.
| |
Don’t you get it? Those machines are crooked and no one seems to care.
|
Proof? Potential for abuse is not a “smoking gun”.
JOHN
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
16 Messages in This Thread:
   
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
