Subject:
|
Re: Repost, for the benefit of those on newsreaders
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Sat, 28 May 2005 15:07:40 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2214 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, John Neal wrote:
| |
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Thomas Stangl wrote:
| |
| |
Have it your way, Burger King, but I still say it is a waste of time and
energy. Dems should be focusing on the future fate of their party, because
it is a mess from my viewpoint.
|
So in other words you have no problem with a voting system that is rigged?
|
That’s my whole point, Tom! The election wasn’t rigged, for pete’s sake!
|
How would you know? The Diebold machines can make up whatever results they’re
programmed to make up, and there is no paper trail of validated vote receipts to
audit... recounts consist of checking the same files again to see if they have
the same data.
Ohio **could** have been stolen and we’d never know. I actually think it more
likely that 2004 was stolen than that 2000 was stolen (I refer specifically to
the Dem vs GOP presidential contest... in reality EVERY election recently has
been “stolen” because the duopoly makes it hard or impossible for new parties to
get started on an equal footing)
Don’t you get it? Those machines are crooked and no one seems to care.
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
16 Messages in This Thread:
   
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
