Subject:
|
Re: What is the exact meaning of MIB?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Wed, 24 Nov 1999 00:46:22 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
412 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.market.auction, Mike Stanley writes:
> Russ Redmyer <redmyer@hotmail.com> wrote:
> > > > And I shouldn't have to wear my seatbelt If I don't want to!
> > >
> > > And you shouldn't receive a dime's worth of medical aid, either from
> > > your insurance plan (unless you specifically contract with them to
> > > provide non seatbelt wearing insurance) or from any kind of
> > > government medical assistance. :)
> >
> >
> > I agree that it should be the prerogative of the insurance carrier to
> > stipulate such things, but definitely not the government.
>
> Just to be clear, you mean that the government should not have the
> right to make it illegal for you to not wear your seatbelt, not that
> the government should not be able to deny you medical aid should you
> choose to not wear it and suffer an injury because of it?
>
> I'd have to wonder if the govt could refuse to give you medical aid
> if you weren't disobeying the law to wear them, though.
>
> --
> The parts you want and nothing else?
> http://jaba.dtrh.com/ - Just Another Brick Auction
> Why pay eBay? Run your own LEGO auctions for free!
> http://www.guarded-inn.com/bricks/
Get a 1956 Olds Like I did and you dont need seatbelts. It's not against the
law with a classic. :)
Lord Doyle
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
28 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
