 | | Re: Holy crap! (was Re: The partisian trap in California) —Dave Schuler
|
| | | (...) No, he can't. Unless, that is, you accept that it is a good act to take pleasure in killing an innocent human being. And if indeed you do accept that, then you undermine all your previous arguments about the evils of fanatical Islam. (...) But (...) (21 years ago, 28-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Holy crap! (was Re: The partisian trap in California) —Richard Marchetti
|
| | | | | (...) Yeah, that's why I used the word "delusion." Delusion -- The act or process of deluding; The state of being deluded; A false belief or opinion; Psychiatry A false belief strongly held in spite of invalidating evidence, especially as a symptom (...) (21 years ago, 28-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Holy crap! (was Re: The partisian trap in California) —Dave Schuler
|
| | | | | | (...) Yeah, I love that story! I believe that it describes the (URL) model of the universe. (URL) Here's> related commentary from the (URL) Skeptic's Dictionary> website: What are we to make of the fact that our personal experience contradicts the (...) (21 years ago, 28-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Holy crap! (was Re: The partisian trap in California) —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | (...) An excellent summation, Dave! It's pretty much where I stand as well. I'll live my life as virtuously as I know how, but I won't rub blue mud in my belly button and then delude myself that doing so somehow makes me better than those that won't (...) (21 years ago, 28-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Holy crap! (was Re: The partisian trap in California) —David Koudys
|
| | | | (...) This is something that got me away from "organized" religion--the most virtuous person I have ever met (imho) is my uncle George--he's up at 5 a.m. flooding the skating rink in the local park for the kids, with no thought of restitution, he's (...) (21 years ago, 28-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Holy crap! (was Re: The partisian trap in California) —Richard Marchetti
|
| | | | (...) Are you saying that the "Good Book" is a creation of man, and therefore flawed? Or that men are unable to understand the meaning of a divine text? I think ultimately I am asking you the value of a flawed or unknowable text. If your (...) (21 years ago, 28-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Holy crap! (was Re: The partisian trap in California) —David Koudys
|
| | | | (...) As clear as poosible givine the context Some folks say that the 'good book' is God's holy word, and as such, is impervious to mistake. Sure. Whatever. That's why every minister that has ever preached and every discourse of specific passages (...) (21 years ago, 28-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Holy crap! (was Re: The partisian trap in California) —Dave Schuler
|
| | | | | (...) This suggests a question that may have been asked herepreviously, but I'd like to follow up on it once again: Accepting that you do believe that God exists, {why} do you believe that God exists? I've asked people this in non-LUGNET life, and (...) (21 years ago, 28-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Holy crap! (was Re: The partisian trap in California) —David Koudys
|
| | | | | | | (...) Well, you won't like my answer then. Being a pretty big fan of science, but only managing to fluff in trying to get a BA, I consider myself a 'pseudo-sciece guy'. Which means I get the general concepts, adn can see how things work and all, but (...) (21 years ago, 28-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Holy crap! (was Re: The partisian trap in California) —Richard Marchetti
|
| | | | | | | (...) I'm with Kooties in that you are not likely to like my answer either. And I am likely to be further marginalized by "uber-pagan" types like Bruce. Keeping in mind that I reject most organized religions out of hand as obviously politically (...) (21 years ago, 29-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Re: Holy crap! —Bruce Schlickbernd
|
| | | | | | | | (...) Marginalized by me? I thought it all great - not quite what I expected from The Angry Young Man. Dave may not like it, but I do. It all fits into a neo-pagan Gaiea world view. I suppose it fits into alot of religions - except for the bit about (...) (21 years ago, 29-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: Holy crap! —Ross Crawford
|
| | | | | | | | (...) As can play^H^H^H^Hbuilding with LEGO bricks. But as a form of meditation I prefer music (playing, listening, laughing at.....) ROSCO (21 years ago, 29-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Holy crap! (was Re: The partisian trap in California) —Bruce Schlickbernd
|
| | | | | | (...) Where's my favorite appeal to logic: if you don't believe in God you will burn in hell for all eternity! -->Bruce<-- (21 years ago, 29-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | Give this man a pat on the back (was Re: Holy crap!) —Adrian Egli
|
| | | | (...) Like the subject line says: "Give this man a pat on the back." Adr. (21 years ago, 29-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
