Debate : 22660


Off-Topic / Debate / 22660	22659 \| 22661

Subject:	Re: Holy crap! (was Re: The partisian trap in California)
Newsgroups:	lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date:	Tue, 28 Oct 2003 17:02:32 GMT
Viewed:	927 times

In lugnet.off-topic.debate, David Koudys wrote: > How about the flawed interpretation of man regarding the essence of God isn't > worthy of adulation? Are you saying that the "Good Book" is a creation of man, and therefore flawed? Or that men are unable to understand the meaning of a divine text? I think ultimately I am asking you the value of a flawed or unknowable text. If your understanding is going to be corrupt or in some way limited -- how do you know what you know about the nature of the divine such that you believe? Am I making myself clear? -- Hop-frog

Message has 1 Reply:

		Re: Holy crap! (was Re: The partisian trap in California)
(...) As clear as poosible givine the context Some folks say that the 'good book' is God's holy word, and as such, is impervious to mistake. Sure. Whatever. That's why every minister that has ever preached and every discourse of specific passages (...) (21 years ago, 28-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Message is in Reply To:

		Re: Holy crap! (was Re: The partisian trap in California)
(...) This is something that got me away from "organized" religion--the most virtuous person I have ever met (imho) is my uncle George--he's up at 5 a.m. flooding the skating rink in the local park for the kids, with no thought of restitution, he's (...) (21 years ago, 28-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

220 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)

Entire Thread on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact

Custom Search