To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 22661
22660  |  22662
Subject: 
Re: Holy crap! (was Re: The partisian trap in California)
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Tue, 28 Oct 2003 17:43:44 GMT
Viewed: 
1123 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Richard Marchetti wrote:
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, David Koudys wrote:
How about the flawed interpretation of man regarding the essence of God isn't
worthy of adulation?

Are you saying that the "Good Book" is a creation of man, and therefore flawed?
Or that men are unable to understand the meaning of a divine text?

I think ultimately I am asking you the value of a flawed or unknowable text. If
your understanding is going to be corrupt or in some way limited -- how do you
know what you know about the nature of the divine such that you believe?

Am I making myself clear?

-- Hop-frog

As clear as poosible givine the context

Some folks say that the 'good book' is God's holy word, and as such, is
impervious to mistake. Sure.  Whatever.  That's why every minister that has ever
preached and every discourse of specific passages all come away with different,
and often contradictory, meanings.

"What Luke really meant to say in this passage is..."  or "When you take the
original Aramaic word and understand it this  you get this interpretation..."

Put a sock in it.

For me, it comes down to whether I believe in an ultimate creator of the
universe.  And I do.

Does God exist?  Yes.

Can s/he be logically and rationally justified/explained?  Dunno--how can a
creation supercede the creator, especially if the creator is All, and the
creation isn't?

The rest of life has to be taken within the 'limits' of our understanding and
logic, and suitably adaptable thereof.

There are 3 things that defy logic--politics, religion, and the fan base of the
Toronto Maple Leafs.

I've learned that discussing any of the three can, and has been, pointless.

Dave K



Message has 2 Replies:
  Re: Holy crap! (was Re: The partisian trap in California)
 
(...) This suggests a question that may have been asked herepreviously, but I'd like to follow up on it once again: Accepting that you do believe that God exists, {why} do you believe that God exists? I've asked people this in non-LUGNET life, and (...) (21 years ago, 28-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
  Give this man a pat on the back (was Re: Holy crap!)
 
(...) Like the subject line says: "Give this man a pat on the back." Adr. (21 years ago, 29-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Holy crap! (was Re: The partisian trap in California)
 
(...) Are you saying that the "Good Book" is a creation of man, and therefore flawed? Or that men are unable to understand the meaning of a divine text? I think ultimately I am asking you the value of a flawed or unknowable text. If your (...) (21 years ago, 28-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

220 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR