To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 20042
20041  |  20043
Subject: 
Re: My over-simplification of the anti-war movement
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Mon, 31 Mar 2003 19:05:30 GMT
Viewed: 
1306 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Bruce Schlickbernd writes:
> Oil: Not in the sense that most people spout about America needing Iraqi oil
> for their SUVs (though I gotta say that Hummer H2 is pretty obscene: worst
> acceleration, worst braking, worst gas milage).  It's the contracts for
> drilling, refining, and transporting the oil.  Look at Cheney's old company
> already getting unbid contracts regarding Iraq.  The French, who are also
> pretending this isn't about oil, are currently freaking because it has
> finally dawned on them that they may lose all their contracts since they
> didn't join in - to the victors go the spoils (I'm just observing what
> happens, not supporting or condemning it).

Well, it is a simplification of things -- but the pro-peace movement also
needs its own soundbite.  "No blood for oil!" has been a kind of code for
larger issues, obviously.  Ignoring ethical concerns for now, longer-term I
can't see the downside to controlling Iraq's enormous wealth in oil -- in 5
or 10 years it will be exploitable if we seize control of it now.  And
current corporate scandals notwithstanding, I have to believe some
businesses are still looking at the big picture and down the road for many
years to come.  I mean, they can't all be cashing out by year's end can they?

> Ditto.  But I don't think our prayers will be answered: note the warnings
> the politicians are starting to issue about tough fighting ahead since their
> planned-for uprisings haven't happened.

Wow.  You mean "the enemy" didn't just go belly up?  What a surprise!  I
guess that would be because Shrub and Rummy have proven themselves strategic
geniuses before, eh?  So no treason en masse on the part of the enemy --
who'd a thunk it!

Sadly, I think there is an ideological aspect to this matter on the other
side and we are about to discover what happens when you disturb a hornet's nest.

-- Hop-Frog



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: My over-simplification of the anti-war movement
 
(...) I'm just not familiar enough with Blair to say, beyond I suspect he likes the idea of acting tough. Bush probably has several agendas, though the weight of each is unknown: Inherited hostility: The enemy of my father is my enemy. Though Bush (...) (24 years ago, 31-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

18 Messages in This Thread:








Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR