To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 20055
20054  |  20056
Subject: 
Re: My over-simplification of the anti-war movement
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Mon, 31 Mar 2003 23:43:25 GMT
Viewed: 
175 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Bruce Schlickbernd writes:

Acting on every imagined threat is ludicrous.  China is a big threat: are we
going to invade them?  North Korea?  Cuba (maybe the Ruskies left a few
nukes behind, Fidel is getting old, and he was stupid enough to advocate
using them during the missle crisis, even though it would have left him dead
and a glowing crater for an island)?  Saudi Arabia: bag men for Al Qaeda?
Russia (they still have nukes)?

And even worse, this action sets a precedent for the above countries (along
with India, Pakistan, etc, etc) to invade other countries (including US, UK,
Australia, etc, etc), without international sanction, because they perceive
a potential threat maybe sometime in the future.

ROSCO



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: My over-simplification of the anti-war movement
 
(...) I'm just not familiar enough with Blair to say, beyond I suspect he likes the idea of acting tough. Bush probably has several agendas, though the weight of each is unknown: Inherited hostility: The enemy of my father is my enemy. Though Bush (...) (22 years ago, 31-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

18 Messages in This Thread:








Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR