Subject:
|
Re: More on the DPRK
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Fri, 21 Mar 2003 19:32:07 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
393 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Joakim Olsson writes:
>
> "Larry Pieniazek" <lpieniazek@mercator.com> wrote in message
> news:HC40sL.1DEt@lugnet.com...
> > Doesn't say nuclear there.
>
> I never said that.
"Nuke em all." was the phrase you used. Did you mean something else by the
use of "nuke" than nuclear? Nuke is colloquial english for nuclear.
Hope that helps.
As for N Korea selling stuff, do your research.
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: More on the DPRK
|
| "Larry Pieniazek" <lpieniazek@mercator.com> wrote in message news:HC469J.1tE7@lugnet.com... (...) Well, why did you respond with: "Doesn´t say nuclear there" if you referred to my statement instead of referring to the article? I have never said that (...) (22 years ago, 21-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: More on the DPRK
|
| "Larry Pieniazek" <lpieniazek@mercator.com> wrote in message news:HC40sL.1DEt@lugnet.com... (...) it (...) I never said that. (...) Is it the same guy that also said "The war party, of which I count myself a member, is therefore now in full (...) (22 years ago, 21-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
12 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
