Subject:
|
Re: More on the DPRK
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Fri, 21 Mar 2003 16:09:12 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
182 times
|
| |
|
|
"Larry Pieniazek" <lpieniazek@mercator.com> wrote in message
news:HC3vLD.wMn@lugnet.com...
> In:
>
> http://www.nationalreview.com/kurtz/kurtz032103.asp
>
> Kurtz makes the case (partly by reanalysing a New Republic article making
> the opposite case!) that either
> - war with the DPRK
> or
> - an eventual loss of a US city to terrorist nukes
> is inevitable as they have already been reprocessing and are not likely to
> allow inspection of their facilities.
Yeah.. better safe than sorry. Nuke em all.
/J
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: More on the DPRK
|
| (...) If that's a serious suggestion, it is a terrible idea. If sarcastic, well then, not reading very closely, are we? Or perhaps you were referring to the DPRK strategy? Mr. Kurtz is not saying we should definitely nuke anybody. Too bad we're at (...) (22 years ago, 21-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | More on the DPRK
|
| In: (URL) makes the case (partly by reanalysing a New Republic article making the opposite case!) that either - war with the DPRK or - an eventual loss of a US city to terrorist nukes is inevitable as they have already been reprocessing and are not (...) (22 years ago, 21-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
12 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
