Subject:
|
Re: More on the DPRK
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Fri, 21 Mar 2003 20:06:37 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
437 times
|
| |
|
|
"Larry Pieniazek" <lpieniazek@mercator.com> wrote in message
news:HC469J.1tE7@lugnet.com...
> > > Doesn't say nuclear there.
> >
> > I never said that.
>
> "Nuke em all." was the phrase you used. Did you mean something else by the
> use of "nuke" than nuclear? Nuke is colloquial english for nuclear.
Well, why did you respond with: "Doesn´t say nuclear there" if you referred
to my statement instead of referring to the article?
I have never said that the suggestion to nuke was from the article, if it
helps you to clear things up.
> Hope that helps.
Sure do.
> As for N Korea selling stuff, do your research.
Never mind. I´ll check on Ebay. ;-)
/J
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: More on the DPRK
|
| (...) Yes it does help. You're merely being dismissive of the author, writing him off with "nuke 'em all", as if that's what the author is advocating... but I made the mistake of taking your comments seriously, when I pointed that isn't what the (...) (22 years ago, 21-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: More on the DPRK
|
| (...) "Nuke em all." was the phrase you used. Did you mean something else by the use of "nuke" than nuclear? Nuke is colloquial english for nuclear. Hope that helps. As for N Korea selling stuff, do your research. (22 years ago, 21-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
12 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
