Subject:
|
Re: More on the DPRK
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Fri, 21 Mar 2003 17:33:57 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
327 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Joakim Olsson writes:
>
> No, I´m not reading wery closely. English is my second language. And yes, it
> was sarcasm.
>
> "Nothing short of war will stop the North Koreans from developing and
> selling nuclear weapons and fuel.
Doesn't say nuclear there.
> The question is whether we will go to war
> before, or after, North Korea spreads its nuclear material"
>
> This sounds pro-war to me, but then again.. this is my second language..
Saying that nothing else will work does not make you "pro" war. It merely
makes you resigned to the inevitable (assuming your analysis is correct).
> Why would DPRK sell it´s nuclear material? I don´t get it. (Language again,
> perhaps)
Their track record speaks for itself. They sell anything to anyone, that's
already well documented, and they need the money.
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: More on the DPRK
|
| "Larry Pieniazek" <lpieniazek@mercator.com> wrote in message news:HC40sL.1DEt@lugnet.com... (...) it (...) I never said that. (...) Is it the same guy that also said "The war party, of which I count myself a member, is therefore now in full (...) (22 years ago, 21-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: More on the DPRK
|
| "Larry Pieniazek" <lpieniazek@mercator.com> wrote in message news:HC3xvn.14rq@lugnet.com... (...) making (...) to (...) the (...) No, I´m not reading wery closely. English is my second language. And yes, it was sarcasm. "Nothing short of war will (...) (22 years ago, 21-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
12 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
