Subject:
|
More on the DPRK
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Fri, 21 Mar 2003 15:41:37 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
192 times
|
| |
|
|
In:
http://www.nationalreview.com/kurtz/kurtz032103.asp
Kurtz makes the case (partly by reanalysing a New Republic article making
the opposite case!) that either
- war with the DPRK
or
- an eventual loss of a US city to terrorist nukes
is inevitable as they have already been reprocessing and are not likely to
allow inspection of their facilities.
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: More on the DPRK
|
| For those joining the discussion late or for those (like me) who weren't immediately able to realize what "DPRK" stands for, it is NOT an abbreviation for Dorney Park. Dave! (22 years ago, 21-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | Re: More on the DPRK
|
| "Larry Pieniazek" <lpieniazek@mercator.com> wrote in message news:HC3vLD.wMn@lugnet.com... (...) Yeah.. better safe than sorry. Nuke em all. /J (22 years ago, 21-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
12 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
